Proceedings 2001 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (Cat. No.01EX494)
DOI: 10.1109/itw.2001.955153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dense multiple antenna systems

Abstract: -We consider multiple antenna systems in which a large number of antennas occupy a given physical volume. In this regime the assumptions of the standard models of multiple antennas systems become questionable. We show that for such spatially dense multiple antenna systems one should expect the behavior of the capacity to be qualitatively different than what the standard multiple antenna models predict.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance is evaluated, as in most other works, in terms of the ratio of total transmit power to noise power per receiver . In this paper, in common with works such as [14] and [17], but unlike [1] and [2], we assume a normalization which ensures that the total receive power is the same as total transmit power, averaged over random instances of the channel matrix, that is (4) This has the effect of separating the array gain, due purely to the increase in antenna gain from more antenna elements, from any gain due to MIMO effects specifically. It is also equivalent to defining the SNR as the ratio of average total received signal power to noise power per element.…”
Section: Finite Scatterers Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance is evaluated, as in most other works, in terms of the ratio of total transmit power to noise power per receiver . In this paper, in common with works such as [14] and [17], but unlike [1] and [2], we assume a normalization which ensures that the total receive power is the same as total transmit power, averaged over random instances of the channel matrix, that is (4) This has the effect of separating the array gain, due purely to the increase in antenna gain from more antenna elements, from any gain due to MIMO effects specifically. It is also equivalent to defining the SNR as the ratio of average total received signal power to noise power per element.…”
Section: Finite Scatterers Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, from (11), the correlation between the m-th and m -th modes at the transmitter region due to any mode at the receiver region is given by…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…receive antennas. It was shown in [11] that the total received power at the receiver array should remain a constant for a given region, regardless of the number of antennas in it. In this situation, the normalized ergodic capacity is given by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set of assumptions would apply, for example, if a systems engineer were considering adding small dipoles to a sparse linear array at the receiver, in which case the total effective area of the receive array would scale with N R . In contrast, [7] independently has considered asymptotic mean capacity for antenna arrays of fixed size assuming that the total average received power is fixed, thereby implying that the total effective area of the receive antennas does not grow with N R . Physically, this set of assumptions models the scenario where a single antenna element the size of the array is replaced with 1536 (5), where L R = 5 λ, ρ = 22 dB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%