2010 International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Electromagnetic Theory 2010
DOI: 10.1109/mmet.2010.5611418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denoising of single-look SAR images based on variance stabilization and nonlocal filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that our method does not present the common artefact encontered when using a logarithmically transformed method (pixels darker than their neighbors circled in red) and preserves edges which are blurry without the shift invariance property (areas circled in orange). Figure 4 compares our method with state of the art methods such as [18], [19] and confirms the gain of a shift invariant model.…”
Section: Results On Sar Imagessupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observe that our method does not present the common artefact encontered when using a logarithmically transformed method (pixels darker than their neighbors circled in red) and preserves edges which are blurry without the shift invariance property (areas circled in orange). Figure 4 compares our method with state of the art methods such as [18], [19] and confirms the gain of a shift invariant model.…”
Section: Results On Sar Imagessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Although covariance Figure 3. Comparisons of denoising results between (b) the NL-SAR filter [18] (c) the BM3D filter on log-tranformed data [19], and (d) the proposed approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The homomorphic approach, used to extend the NL-means [31], [32] and BM3D [33], first applies a logarithmic transform to the data so that noise becomes additive, then performs a standard non-local filter, and finally applies an exponential transform to map the filtered data back to their original dynamic range. A bias-correction step is necessary to correct for non-Gaussianity in log-space [34].…”
Section: Point-wisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this, a considerably larger amount of filtering techniques has been designed for removal of AWGN than multiplicative noise. Taking this into account, images corrupted by multiplicative and other types of signal dependent noises are frequently processed applying homomorphic and/or variance stabilizing transformations [32,33]. These transformations for the case of pure multiplicative noise are of logarithmic type [1,25,32] [32], additive noise variance becomes equal to unity although additive noise is also nonGaussian.…”
Section: Prediction For Homomorphic Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%