2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-018-0819-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denoising of Image Gradients and Total Generalized Variation Denoising

Abstract: We revisit total variation denoising and study an augmented model where we assume that an estimate of the image gradient is available. We show that this increases the image reconstruction quality and derive that the resulting model resembles the total generalized variation denoising method, thus providing a new motivation for this model. Further, we propose to use a constraint denoising model and develop a variational denoising model that is basically parameter free, i.e. all model parameters are estimated dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Derivation of curvatures is less error-prone than shape integration and does not require accurate prior knowledge of the distance to the object. Differentiation amplifies noise (Komander, 2019;Komander et al, 2019) but-unlike integration-does not spread correlated errors over the surface.…”
Section: Advanced Optical Technologies Frontiersinorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derivation of curvatures is less error-prone than shape integration and does not require accurate prior knowledge of the distance to the object. Differentiation amplifies noise (Komander, 2019;Komander et al, 2019) but-unlike integration-does not spread correlated errors over the surface.…”
Section: Advanced Optical Technologies Frontiersinorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derivation of curvatures is less error-prone than shape integration and does not require accurate prior knowledge of the distance to the object. Differentiation amplifies noise [43,44] but (unlike integration) does not spread correlated errors over the surface.…”
Section: Deflectometry Vs Fringe Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%