2019 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icus48101.2019.8996040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denoising Method of Pulsar Photon Signal Based on Recurrent Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we already have pulsars with high SNRs before sending those profiles to the folding algorithm, then it is imperative that a lesser number of periods would be required for pulsar folding, which also implies that the observing telescope would need to observe the pulsars for a shorter duration of time to generate the same SNR after folding, and thus, we can generate high quality single pulse profiles using a combination of Machine Learning and Folding techniques in a more effective manner. Some head-start has already been made in this, where deep Recurrent neural networks have been used to denoise the pulsar profiles [13], but the initial SNR which was sent to the RNN algorithm was hovering around 6 in their work which is on the higher side as compared to our work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If we already have pulsars with high SNRs before sending those profiles to the folding algorithm, then it is imperative that a lesser number of periods would be required for pulsar folding, which also implies that the observing telescope would need to observe the pulsars for a shorter duration of time to generate the same SNR after folding, and thus, we can generate high quality single pulse profiles using a combination of Machine Learning and Folding techniques in a more effective manner. Some head-start has already been made in this, where deep Recurrent neural networks have been used to denoise the pulsar profiles [13], but the initial SNR which was sent to the RNN algorithm was hovering around 6 in their work which is on the higher side as compared to our work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In [10], a new, two-stage approach for identifying and classifying dispersed pulse groups (DPGs) in single-pulse search output is presented, and [11] has reduced the amount of pulsar candidates to be visually inspected by several orders of magnitude. In [12], a strategy to classify a big set of unbalanced pulsar data has been proposed, and [13] works on improving the SNR of a pulsar candidate through recurrent neural networks(RNN). Recent studies like [14] and [15] present a holistic review of machine learning based pulsar search algorithms [13] has focused on a similar problem, while working on the data from the Vela pulsar from the RXTE mission, where they have proposed a different (deep learning based) approach to boost the SNR of pulsars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has also been shown in [ 21 ] that the wavelet denoising methodology heavily relies on expertise and experience and is not compatible with an average processor. New approaches to increase the SNR of X-ray pulsar signals can be found in [ 25 ] with a machine learning method and in [ 26 ] with a recurrent neural network method, respectively. These two kinds of denoising strategies actually require high computational costs too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%