2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-004-5978-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DenNit – Experimental analysis and modelling of soil N2O efflux in response on changes of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH, nutrient availability and the time after rain event

Abstract: To quantify the effects of soil temperature (T soil ), and relative soil water content (RSWC) on soil N 2 O emission we measured N 2 O soil efflux with a closed dynamic chamber in situ in the field and from soil cores in a controlled climate chamber experiment. Additionally we analysed the effect of soil acidity, ammonium, and nitrate concentration in the field. The analysis was performed on three meadows, two bare soils and in one forest. We identified soil water content, soil temperature, soil nitrogen conte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But we also found negative correlations. This is in contrast to the expectations for denitrification processes: Higher soil temperatures should enable higher formation of N 2 O via denitrification, but could also lead to a reduced nitrification (Reth et al 2005). Apparently, other parameters not considered in this study influence the production and consumption of N 2 O in the four lysimeters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But we also found negative correlations. This is in contrast to the expectations for denitrification processes: Higher soil temperatures should enable higher formation of N 2 O via denitrification, but could also lead to a reduced nitrification (Reth et al 2005). Apparently, other parameters not considered in this study influence the production and consumption of N 2 O in the four lysimeters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…reviews of Clough et al 2001;Heincke and Kaupenjohann 1999). This applies also for the N 2 O fluxes from the soil to the atmosphere (Reth et al 2005;Schürmann et al 2002). It is essential to characterize and to model the processes involved in the production and consumption, and the transport of N 2 O.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most critical factor determining the reliability of the method in hot environmental conditions seems to be the length of the gas accumulation period. In the literature reported accumulation periods range from 2 to 3 min (Hans et al 2005;Reth et al 2005) until 1 h (Velthof et al 2003;van Groenigen et al 2005). Because in our study the rapid increase in gas concentration, the raise in temperature and the built-up of humidity in the cuvette, especially during the midday measurements, influenced emission fluxes (feed back mechanisms), we have shortened the accumulation period to 1 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is combined with other reduction functions related to soil nitrate content or soil temperature, which are used together to estimate N 2 O fluxes. For example, the DenNit (Reth et al 2005), ECOSSE (Smith et al 2010), and NOE (Hénault et al 2005) models used such functions. The F W function can be described as a continuous exponential curve starting at a WFPS value of 0.62 in the NOE and ECOSSE models, an arctangent function with a level off for WFPS [ 0.7-0.9 in DAYCENT (Del Grosso et al 2000), a sigmoid curve with half maximum N 2 O emissions at 60 % of the field capacity in DenNit, or a linear growing function starting at the drained upper limit in APSIM (Keating et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%