2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denitrification and microbial community in MBBR using A. donax as carbon source and biofilm carriers for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As illustrated in Table 2, the turbulent conditions might be worsened when the FR is greater than 50%, and a large number of microorganisms might be stripped from the carrier surface due to the effects of mass transfer and hydraulic shearing, thus impeding the growth of the bacteria related with NH 4 + -N removal. Li et al reported that the anammox gene existed in the carrier biofilm of denitrifying MBBR for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment [23]. The weakening of the anammox gene bacteria is bound to reduce the NH 4 + -N removal efficiency of the whole system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As illustrated in Table 2, the turbulent conditions might be worsened when the FR is greater than 50%, and a large number of microorganisms might be stripped from the carrier surface due to the effects of mass transfer and hydraulic shearing, thus impeding the growth of the bacteria related with NH 4 + -N removal. Li et al reported that the anammox gene existed in the carrier biofilm of denitrifying MBBR for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment [23]. The weakening of the anammox gene bacteria is bound to reduce the NH 4 + -N removal efficiency of the whole system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al found that 25℃ was the optimum temperature for the removal of nitrogen from WWTP effluent by denitrifying MBBR, considering the nitrogen and organic removal efficiency as a whole [22]. Li et al used raw Arundo donax pieces as carbon source and biofilm carrier in a lab-scale denitrifying MBBR to remove NO 3 − -N from reverse osmosis concentrate, with high denitrification capability (73.2% ± 19.5% NO 3 − -N removal efficiency and 8.10 ± 3.45 g NO 3 − -N/m 3 /d volumetric removal rate) obtained at stable operation stage [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…German scientists have made a considerable contribution to the study of this field [22]. So, in particular, a system of wastewater treatment using biofilm is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies presented slower nitrate removal rate than those reported here (Table 3). Firstly, the study by Li et al (2019), which focused on treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate containing nitrate by biomass fixed to polyethylene biocarriers, reported a denitrification rate of 0.08 kg-N/m 3 /d. Similarly, the FIGURE 5 | (A) Nitrate concentration with time, where the initial concentration is 200 mg/l; treatment vs. sterile controls in biomass immobilized in aqueous solution (batch moving bed bioreactor) at three different C:N ratios (1:1, 2:1, and 3:1) and in non-immobilized biomass in suspension (flasks) at a C:N ratio of 3:1.…”
Section: Batch Moving Bed Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%