2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dendritic Spine Heterogeneity Determines Afferent-Specific Hebbian Plasticity in the Amygdala

Abstract: Functional compartmentalization of dendrites is thought to underlie afferent-specific integration of neural activity in laminar brain structures. Here we show that in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA), an area lacking apparent laminar organization, thalamic and cortical afferents converge on the same dendrites, contacting neighboring but morphologically and functionally distinct spine types. Large spines contacted by thalamic afferents exhibited larger Ca(2+) transients during action potential backpropa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
133
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
10
133
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Different forms of LTP could be observed, however, at synapses in the amygdala (7,8,(10)(11)(12) as well as in other regions of the brain (13,14), depending on the presynaptic activity levels and degree of postsynaptic depolarization. Thus, conventional pairing-induced LTP and spike timing-dependent LTP in thalamic projections to the LA are expressed postsynaptically and may implicate trafficking of AMPA receptors at stimulated synapses ("post-LTP") (8,15), whereas LTP in cortical input to the LA is expressed presynaptically, resulting from an increase in the probability of neurotransmitter release ("pre-LTP") (7). Little is known, however, about whether the coexisting forms of LTP at glutamatergic synapses interact with each other during the induction process, and if they do, how such interactions could be mediated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different forms of LTP could be observed, however, at synapses in the amygdala (7,8,(10)(11)(12) as well as in other regions of the brain (13,14), depending on the presynaptic activity levels and degree of postsynaptic depolarization. Thus, conventional pairing-induced LTP and spike timing-dependent LTP in thalamic projections to the LA are expressed postsynaptically and may implicate trafficking of AMPA receptors at stimulated synapses ("post-LTP") (8,15), whereas LTP in cortical input to the LA is expressed presynaptically, resulting from an increase in the probability of neurotransmitter release ("pre-LTP") (7). Little is known, however, about whether the coexisting forms of LTP at glutamatergic synapses interact with each other during the induction process, and if they do, how such interactions could be mediated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory information reaches the LA by two main glutamatergic pathways originating in sensory thalamus and cortex (1). The induction and expression of LTP at thalamo-LA synapses is mediated by Ca 2ϩ influx through postsynaptic NMDA receptors eventually leading to the recruitment of new AMPA receptors to the postsynaptic membrane (4)(5)(6)(7). LTP at cortico-LA synapses is mediated by contrasting mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LTP at cortico-LA synapses is mediated by contrasting mechanisms. Pairing of presynaptic stimulation with postsynaptic depolarization triggers LTP that is induced postsynaptically (5,(8)(9)(10) and may involve both pre-and postsynaptic expression mechanisms, such as an increase in glutamate release and the recruitment of postsynaptic AMPA receptors (7)(8)(9)(10). In contrast, coactivation of the thalamo-and the cortico-LA pathways results in NMDA receptor-dependent LTP that is induced and expressed entirely via presynaptic mechanisms (10,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IL1RAPL1/NCS-1 interaction could be essential for synaptic physiology: Indeed, NCS-1 modulates VGCC activity at synapses thereby controlling short term plasticity (13). In addition, Ca 2ϩ signaling in both synaptic compartments efficiently controls long term plasticity (38,39), thought to be the cellular substrate for learning and memory. Our proposals are in line with the recent progress in the field of MR suggesting that synaptic defects may explain the cognitive impairment resulting from mutations in MR-related genes which products are localized at the pre-and/or postsynaptic compartments (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%