2014
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dendritic diameters affect the spatial variability of intracellular calcium dynamics in computer models

Abstract: There is growing interest in understanding calcium dynamics in dendrites, both experimentally and computationally. Many processes influence these dynamics, but in dendrites there is a strong contribution of morphology because the peak calcium levels are strongly determined by the surface to volume ratio (SVR) of each branch, which is inversely related to branch diameter. In this study we explore the predicted variance of dendritic calcium concentrations due to local changes in dendrite diameter and how this is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we considered the activation of voltage-dependent currents in the dendrites (Anwar et al, 2014 ) by delivering the appropriate multisynaptic stimulation pattern to the PC model in pacemaking regime. The higher synaptic depolarization in sector II than in sector I resulted in a stronger voltage-dependent activation of Ca channels in the former than in the latter (Figure 7B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we considered the activation of voltage-dependent currents in the dendrites (Anwar et al, 2014 ) by delivering the appropriate multisynaptic stimulation pattern to the PC model in pacemaking regime. The higher synaptic depolarization in sector II than in sector I resulted in a stronger voltage-dependent activation of Ca channels in the former than in the latter (Figure 7B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate estimates of diameters of dendrites are important for computational modeling of neurons (Psarrou et al, 2014; Anwar et al, 2014). Our automated algorithm works quite well in determining the diameters, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles by Rapp et al ( 1992 , 1994 ) and De Schutter and Bower ( 1994a , b , c ) have collectively been cited more than 500 times, with the first description of the active Purkinje cell model De Schutter and Bower ( 1994a ) responsible for almost half those citations. Importantly, the model, we now refer to as the “R-DB model”, has formed the basis for considerable subsequent work from my own students both within my laboratory (Jaeger et al, 1996 ; Baldi et al, 1998 ; Sultan and Bower, 1998 ; Jaeger and Bower, 1999 ; Mocanu et al, 2000 ; Santamaria et al, 2002 , 2007 ; Santamaria and Bower, 2004 ; Lu et al, 2005 , 2009 ; Cornelis et al, 2010 ) and within their own independent laboratories and research (Staub et al, 1994 ; De Schutter, 1998 ; Vos et al, 1999 ; Howell et al, 2000 ; Steuber and De Schutter, 2001 , 2002 ; Gauck and Jaeger, 2003 ; Solinas et al, 2003 , 2006 ; Kreiner and Jaeger, 2004 ; Koekkoek et al, 2005 ; Santamaria et al, 2006 , 2011 ; Shin and De Schutter, 2006 ; Shin et al, 2007 ; Steuber et al, 2007 ; Achard and De Schutter, 2008 ; De Schutter and Steuber, 2009 ; Anwar et al, 2012 , 2013 , 2014 ; Coop et al, 2010 ; Tahon et al, 2011 ; Cao et al, 2012 ; Couto et al, 2015 ). Perhaps more importantly the R-DB model has become a true “community model” as it is now being used by a growing number of authors as a base for further modeling work outside its laboratories of origin (Coop and Reeke, 2001 ; Mandelblat et al, 2001 ; Miyasho et al, 2001 ; Roth and Häusser, 2001 ; Chono et al, 2003 ; Khaliq et al, 2003 ; Steuber and Willshaw, 2004 ; Ogasawara et al, 2007 ; Yamazaki and Tanaka, ...…”
Section: Emergence Of a Community Purkinje Cell Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%