2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions

Abstract: Immunotherapeutic approaches, including adoptive cell therapy, revolutionized treatment in multiple myeloma (MM). As dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells and key initiators of tumor-specific immune responses, DC-based immunotherapy represents an attractive therapeutic approach in cancer. The past years, various DC-based approaches, using particularly ex-vivo-generated monocyte-derived DCs, have been tested in preclinical and clinical MM studies. However, long-term and durable respons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
(246 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, over the last decades several DC vaccine formulations with sufficiently wide spectrum of immunogenicity have been clinically tested without sufficiently proportional clinical success. 101 , 251–255 Thus, it is not clear if the lack of immunogenicity is the sole reason for clinical failure of DC vaccines or if there are also specific primary, adaptive, or acquired resistance pathways that require better attention, together with the limitations of preclinical models in accurately reflecting the clinical reality. 256–259 We believe that preclinical research needs to better address the previous clinical failures of DC vaccines and move forward in a definitive fashion to avoid redundancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, over the last decades several DC vaccine formulations with sufficiently wide spectrum of immunogenicity have been clinically tested without sufficiently proportional clinical success. 101 , 251–255 Thus, it is not clear if the lack of immunogenicity is the sole reason for clinical failure of DC vaccines or if there are also specific primary, adaptive, or acquired resistance pathways that require better attention, together with the limitations of preclinical models in accurately reflecting the clinical reality. 256–259 We believe that preclinical research needs to better address the previous clinical failures of DC vaccines and move forward in a definitive fashion to avoid redundancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DC-based cancer vaccines are based on optimal antigen presentation and T cell activation of DCs. Between 1995 and 2021, many DC vaccines were tested in melanoma, B cell lymphoma, metastatic colorectal cancer, hematologic malignancies, and hepatocellular cancer [27][28][29][30][31]. A critical area in DC vaccine design and translation is the culture condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouse cDC2 is specifically used for MHC II presentation and the induction of CD4 + T cell responses, including Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells [ 21 ]. Compared to mouse cDC1, which mainly initiates the cellular immune response, mouse cDC2 mainly initiates the humoral immune response [ 22 ].…”
Section: Mouse DC Subsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%