2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep39682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dendritic and Axonal Propagation Delays Determine Emergent Structures of Neuronal Networks with Plastic Synapses

Abstract: Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) modifies synaptic strengths based on the relative timing of pre- and postsynaptic spikes. The temporal order of spikes turned out to be crucial. We here take into account how propagation delays, composed of dendritic and axonal delay times, may affect the temporal order of spikes. In a minimal setting, characterized by neglecting dendritic and axonal propagation delays, STDP eliminates bidirectional connections between two coupled neurons and turns them into unidirectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, future studies should also use other neuronal network models, e.g., network of FitzHugh-Rinzel bursting neurons (Rinzel, 1987 ; Izhikevich, 2001 ). By the same token, sham stimulation should ideally be inactive also in the presence of additional features and mechanisms, such as synaptic noise (Destexhe et al, 2003 ), propagation delays (Madadi Asl et al, 2017 ) as well for different stimulation mechanisms, e.g., excitatory vs. inhibitory stimulation (Popovych and Tass, 2012 ). Hence, future computational studies should take into account these refinements, too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, future studies should also use other neuronal network models, e.g., network of FitzHugh-Rinzel bursting neurons (Rinzel, 1987 ; Izhikevich, 2001 ). By the same token, sham stimulation should ideally be inactive also in the presence of additional features and mechanisms, such as synaptic noise (Destexhe et al, 2003 ), propagation delays (Madadi Asl et al, 2017 ) as well for different stimulation mechanisms, e.g., excitatory vs. inhibitory stimulation (Popovych and Tass, 2012 ). Hence, future computational studies should take into account these refinements, too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to stabilize strong bidirectional connections by employing variations of STDP 22 or by considering independent noise 31 in the plastic neuronal networks. On the other hand, as shown recently, by taking into account dendritic and axonal propagation delays, the conventional pair-based additive STDP may lead to the emergence of different connectivity patterns including both unidirectional and bidirectional connections, or decoupled neurons 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In STDP, the occurrence of timing-dependent-long-term potentiation (tLTP) or -depression (tLTD) is the result of three factors. The two first ones are the two coincident activity patterns on either side of the synapse, which depends on (1) the relative timing between pre- and postsynaptic spikes (Δ t STDP ) 4 , 8 , (2) the dendritic and axonal propagation delays 9 , (3) the number of paired spikes ( N pairings ) 10 13 , (4) the frequency of the paired spikes ( F pairings ) 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 14 and (5) membrane depolarization 14 , 15 ; the third factor involves in STDP expression mainly refers to neuromodulators 16 , 17 and glial cells 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%