2000
DOI: 10.1080/13640461.2000.11819387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dendrite structure control in directionally solidified bronze castings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] In the present report, the focus is on the directional solidification of Al-and Zn-based alloys and, more particularly, on the columnar, equiaxed growth, and columnar-to-equiaxed transition (CET). Experimental evidence of the CET has been reported in previous articles, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and also a number of mechanisms for the phenomenon of the CET have been proposed. It has been demonstrated that the CET is influenced by casting size, composition, and constitution of the alloy system, melt superheat, stirring, heat-transfer coefficient at the metal mold interface, inoculation, cooling rate of the mold, temperature gradient, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] In the present report, the focus is on the directional solidification of Al-and Zn-based alloys and, more particularly, on the columnar, equiaxed growth, and columnar-to-equiaxed transition (CET). Experimental evidence of the CET has been reported in previous articles, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and also a number of mechanisms for the phenomenon of the CET have been proposed. It has been demonstrated that the CET is influenced by casting size, composition, and constitution of the alloy system, melt superheat, stirring, heat-transfer coefficient at the metal mold interface, inoculation, cooling rate of the mold, temperature gradient, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Here, we focus on experiments where the heat flow was essentially unidirectional and the alloy was a simple binary system, namely, Al-Cu, [17,23,24] Al-Si, [21] Sn-Pb, [16,24] Cu-Sn, [25,26] Pb-Sn, [27] and Al-Mg. [28] In these experiments, the position of the CET in the solidified samples was studied as a function of process variables, including pouring superheat, addition of inoculants, alloy composition, heat extraction rate, and average cooling rate. In all cases, the experimental apparatus basically consisted of a thermally insulating sleeve resting on a metallic base, through which the heat was extracted.…”
Section: B Experiments On the Cet In Directional Solidification Of Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to the strategy adopted here, in the literature [34][35][36][37][38] the identification of the CET position has always been uniquely based on the visual examination of the grain macrostructures, which, to a large extent, is a subjective process. In the present work, the previous ranges of aspect ratios were defined for the best agreement between the visually identified CET and those obtained from the proposed method.…”
Section: Aspect Ratio Criterion To Determine the Cetmentioning
confidence: 98%