2014
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.12401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demystifying NUT Midline Carcinoma: Radiologic and Pathologic Correlations of an Aggressive Malignancy

Abstract: Given the rarity of this disease process and lack of pathognomonic imaging findings, a definitive diagnosis based solely on imaging findings alone is untenable. Select cases are used to emphasize the particularly infiltrative and aggressive nature of NUT midline carcinoma, which shows a complete disregard for normal tissue boundaries and rapid progression during brief intervals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
45
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Selected radiographic, pathologic and/or molecular features of cases 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 have been included in previous reports. 1,13,15,16 The mean age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 41 years (median 30, range 21-68). Clinical history was available for 7 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected radiographic, pathologic and/or molecular features of cases 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 have been included in previous reports. 1,13,15,16 The mean age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 41 years (median 30, range 21-68). Clinical history was available for 7 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT images are most frequently characterized by hypoattenuation and heterogenous enhancement of an infiltrative or destructive appearing mass. Occasional intralesional calcifications have been reported [7]. Despite the frequent evidence of disregard for normal tissue boundaries, the current case displayed some evidence circumscription and osseous remodeling.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 49%
“…MR images also characteristically demonstrate a heterogenous mass with hypointense T1 and hyperintense T2 signalling, although the current case was only mildly hyperintense on both. MRI is the preferred modality with regards to delineation of tumor margins and for treatment planning [7]. The non-specific radiographic features of NMC necessitate the development of a broad differential diagnosis with primary consideration given to aggressive malignancies, including sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, melanoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma family tumors and hematologic malignancies.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjunctive MRI is performed if there is a concern for the chest wall, vascular, or cardiac invasion. [4] The signal intensity on T2-weighted MRIs is that of a cellular neoplasm, but imaging characteristics are otherwise indistinguishable from other high-grade neoplasms such as lymphoma or sarcoma. [5] FDG-PET/CT is the preferred modality for guiding biopsy to viable tissue, staging and assessment of metastatic disease, evaluation of disease treatment response, and restaging with assessment of disease extent and severity over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] FDG-PET/CT is the preferred modality for guiding biopsy to viable tissue, staging and assessment of metastatic disease, evaluation of disease treatment response, and restaging with assessment of disease extent and severity over time. [4]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%