1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2896(15)30468-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demoras en el diagnóstico y en el tratamiento quirúrgico del carcinoma broncogénico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the mean time between diagnostic confirmation and surgery was 35 days (range, 1-154 days) for 1082 patients with clinical stage I and II tumors. López Encuentra et al 5 described a mean waiting period of 45.2 (34.7) days. Other authors have reported mean delays of 24 to 47 days, with actual figures ranging from 4 to 172 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that study, the mean time between diagnostic confirmation and surgery was 35 days (range, 1-154 days) for 1082 patients with clinical stage I and II tumors. López Encuentra et al 5 described a mean waiting period of 45.2 (34.7) days. Other authors have reported mean delays of 24 to 47 days, with actual figures ranging from 4 to 172 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various authors have analyzed diagnostic delay in lung cancer in this way. 2,5,6,21,22 Therefore, all these components should be remembered in managing this disease and future studies should cover the entire process of diagnosis and treatment. Efforts to reduce waiting times should continue, for even though a clear association with survival has not been found, there is still a small group of patients who have potentially treatable disease whose prognosis might change because of delay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%