Demoralizing: integrating J.D. Peters’ communication “chasm” with Niklas Luhmann’s (1989) ecological communication to analyze climate change mitigation inaction

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain the US society’s insignificant mitigation of climate change using Niklas Luhmann’s (1989) autopoietic social systems theory in ecological communication. Specifically, the author’s analysis falls within the context of Luhmann re-moralized while focusing on particular function systems’ binary codes and their repellence of substantive US climate change mitigation policy across systems. Design/methodology/approach The author achieves this purpose by resituating Luhmann’s conception of evolution to forgo systems teleology and better contextualize the spatial-temporal scale of climate change; reinforcing complexity reduction and differentiation by integrating communication and media scholar John D. Peters’s (1999) “communication chasm” concept as one mechanism through which codes sustain over time; and applying these integrated concepts to prominent the US climate change mitigation attempts. Findings The author concludes that climate change mitigation efforts are the amalgamation of the systems’ moral communications. Mitigation efforts have relegated themselves to subsystems of the ten major systems given the polarizing nature of their predominant care/harm moral binary. Communication chasms persist because these moral communications cannot both adhere to the systems’ binary codes and communicate the climate crisis’s urgency. The more time that passes, the more codes force mitigation organizations, activist efforts and their moral communications to adapt and sacrifice their actions to align with the encircling systems’ code. Social implications In addition to the conceptual contribution, the social implication is that by identifying how and why climate change mitigation efforts are subsumed by the larger systems and their codes, climate change activists and practitioners can better tool their tactics to change the codes at the heart of the systems if serious and substantive climate change mitigation is to prevail. Originality/value To the author’s knowledge, there has not been an integration of a historical communication concept into, and sociological application of, ecological communication in the context of climate change mitigation.

Relational positionism: a constructive interpretation of morality in Luhmann's social systems theory

“…The nature of morality is, therefore, not to consider specific risk issues but to pose problems of risk itself (e.g. Luhmann, 1987, p. 97; Astola et al ., 2022a, b; Dameski et al ., 2022; Martin et al ., 2023; Miller, 2022).…”

Moral communication observed with social systems theory. An introduction

“…Demoralizing: integrating J.D. Peters' communication "chasm" with Niklas Luhmann's (1989) ecological communication to analyze climate change mitigation inaction by Miller (2021) applies the framework outlined in Luhmann's Ecological Communication (1989) to analyze contemporary attempts at mitigating climate changes in the United States. The author argues that climate changes are a highly complex phenomenon which forces different systems to simplify matters thereby missing important insights.…”

The Global Evolution of Ecological Communication Studies in Disasters: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…In ecological communication, attention is paid to the patterns and communication networks within a system. This includes the way individuals and groups communicate with each other, how messages and information are disseminated and received, and the impact of communication on individuals and the surrounding environment (Miller, 2022).…”