2020
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202000722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of protein capture and separation using three‐dimensional printed anion exchange monoliths fabricated in one‐step

Abstract: Three-dimensional printing applications in separation science are currently limited by the lack of materials compatible with chromatographic operations and three-dimensional printing technologies. In this work, we propose a new material for Digital Light Processing printing to fabricate functional ion exchange monoliths in a single step. Through copolymerization of the bifunctional monomer [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride, monolithic structures with quaternary amine ligands were fabricated. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, approximately 90% of the proteins adsorbed were recovered during elution for both materials, demonstrating that the strength of the electrostatic interactions can be appropriately adjusted to enable bind and elute operation of the ion exchangers. The broad elution peaks confirm mass transfer limitations from the bulk of the 3D printed media to the liquid phase during elution (Simon et al 2020), an open challenge requiring improvements in the resolution achievable with current 3D printers. Appropriate process development also needs to be carried out to determine the optimal operating conditions to maximize the overall yield of the separation step.…”
Section: Application As Stationary Phase For Ion Exchange Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Also, approximately 90% of the proteins adsorbed were recovered during elution for both materials, demonstrating that the strength of the electrostatic interactions can be appropriately adjusted to enable bind and elute operation of the ion exchangers. The broad elution peaks confirm mass transfer limitations from the bulk of the 3D printed media to the liquid phase during elution (Simon et al 2020), an open challenge requiring improvements in the resolution achievable with current 3D printers. Appropriate process development also needs to be carried out to determine the optimal operating conditions to maximize the overall yield of the separation step.…”
Section: Application As Stationary Phase For Ion Exchange Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Maximum binding capacities of 104.2 ± 10.6 mg of BSA per mL of AETAC-based support, and 108.1 ± 25.9 mg of LYS per mL of CEA-based material were recorded (Figure 2a and 2b), about 5 fold higher than for commercial monoliths (Hahn et al, 2002) and chromatographic membranes (Boi et al, 2020) and in line or above standard chromatographic resins (Staby et al, 2005). Testing in dynamic conditions was carried out using Schoen gyroid columns (Figure 1f-h) by loading BSA and myoglobin (MYO) onto the AETAC material (Figure 2c, Simon et al, 2020) and BSA and LYS on the CEA material (Figure 2d). The chromatograms reveal elution patterns in line with the electrostatic interactions established at the buffer's pH, thus con rming the availability of the surface quaternary amine and carboxyl groups to establish appropriate electrostatic interactions with the protein models.…”
Section: Application As Stationary Phase For Ion Exchange Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2. Adsorption isotherms of (a) bovine serum albumin (BSA) on anion exchangers (based on AETAC monomer, adapted from Simon et al, 2020), and (b) lysozyme (LYS) on cation exchangers (based on CEA monomer). Ligand densities of 0 (control), 0.57, 1.14, 1.73, 2.33 mmol/mL and of 0 (control), 0.77, 1.56, 2.36, 3.23 mmol/mL were tested for the anion and cation exchanger, respectively.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum binding capacities of 104.2 ± 10.6 mg of BSA per mL of AETAC-based support, and 108.1 ± 25.9 mg of LYS per mL of CEA-based material were recorded (Figure 2a and 2b), about 5 fold higher than for commercial monoliths (Hahn et al, 2002) and chromatographic membranes (Boi et al, 2020) and in line or above standard chromatographic resins (Staby et al, 2005). Testing in dynamic conditions was carried out using Schoen gyroid columns ( Figure 1f-h) by loading BSA and myoglobin (MYO) onto the AETAC material ( Figure 2c, Simon et al, 2020) and BSA and LYS on the CEA material ( Figure 2d). The chromatograms reveal elution pattern in line with the electrostatic interactions established at the buffer's pH, thus confirming the availability of the surface quaternary amine and carboxyl groups to establish appropriate electrostatic interactions with the protein models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%