2013
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of ground-penetrating radar as a useful tool for assessing pocket gopher burrows

Abstract: Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an innovative and non-invasive method that uses radar to penetrate the ground and develop three-dimensional digital images of the top several meters of the earth. Ground-penetrating radar has been used extensively in the fields of engineering, military science, forensic science, archaeology, and environmental remediation, but has received little attention by wildlife professionals. We demonstrated a possible application of GPR for wildlife studies for mapping burrow systems us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although every case study will be unique as discussed by others (see [30][31]), the research presented here has important implications for the use of geoscience techniques to assist forensic practitioners with wildlife crime investigations as [29] [32][33][34]37]), with others showing both similar frequencies [37] and up to 900 MHz frequency antenna to be deployed [41], but here, the combination of the two different techniques also importantly allowed the quantification of the spatial location of filled entrances and the amount of tunnel infill. This geoscientific information, combined with the lack of slurry elsewhere on the surface, made the alternative hypothesis of an accidental deposition of slurry on the surface by a perpetrator(s) extremely unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although every case study will be unique as discussed by others (see [30][31]), the research presented here has important implications for the use of geoscience techniques to assist forensic practitioners with wildlife crime investigations as [29] [32][33][34]37]), with others showing both similar frequencies [37] and up to 900 MHz frequency antenna to be deployed [41], but here, the combination of the two different techniques also importantly allowed the quantification of the spatial location of filled entrances and the amount of tunnel infill. This geoscientific information, combined with the lack of slurry elsewhere on the surface, made the alternative hypothesis of an accidental deposition of slurry on the surface by a perpetrator(s) extremely unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geoscientific site investigation methods for search vary depending upon the specific case, site, and numerous other factors that are reviewed elsewhere [30][31]. 6 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) has been evidenced to be able to both detect and map animal burrows, from gophers [32][33], European rabbits [34], moles [35], wombats [36] to badgers [37]. Water penetrating radar (WPR) had also been successfully deployed within a water-filled ditch in a rural area to locate illegally-dumped badger remains [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, applicators should attempt to ensure that no portion of the mole burrow system is within 50 feet of a structure. Recently, ground-penetrating radar has been used to assess rodent burrow systems (Cortez et al 2013). Perhaps this technology could be used in the future to help identify the nearest distance of a burrow to an inhabited structure.…”
Section: Risk Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first published study was done in 1996 to map rabbit warrens on the Adelaide plains of South Australia (Stott, 1996). Subsequently, GPR has been used to investigate badgers (Meles meles) in Wales (Nichol et al, 2003), gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in Florida (Kinlaw et al, 2007), and pocket gophers in Texas (Geomys personatus maritimus) (Cortez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Survey Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%