1977
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80949-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of binding of triton X‐100 to amphiphilic proteins in crossed immunoelectrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antigens were probably of cytoplasmic origin because similar results were obtained with and without saponin in the gels, although this detergent is not always a reliable indicator of a non-membrane origin of proteins (Bjerrum & Bhakdi, 1977), but hydrophobic interaction chromatography appeared to confirm the cytoplasmic origin of the antigens since all the arcs detected were in the cytoplasmic fraction of the eluant. However, some arcs were not detected by Laurell IEP following this technique and some antigens may have remained firmly bound to the column.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The antigens were probably of cytoplasmic origin because similar results were obtained with and without saponin in the gels, although this detergent is not always a reliable indicator of a non-membrane origin of proteins (Bjerrum & Bhakdi, 1977), but hydrophobic interaction chromatography appeared to confirm the cytoplasmic origin of the antigens since all the arcs detected were in the cytoplasmic fraction of the eluant. However, some arcs were not detected by Laurell IEP following this technique and some antigens may have remained firmly bound to the column.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The analysis performed on human serum protein shows that the plates must be washed with water before a safe identification can be performed, even though the Sudan Blackstained precipitates are more distinct on the wet plates. The method is less sensitive than charge-shift crossed immunoelectrophoresis, but gives results similar to the use of radioactive detergent [6]. The sensitivity is about the same, i. e., only major precipitates can be identified, but the Sudan Black method is much faster, since the results can be directly read from the washed immunoplate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%