2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of a treatment system for purification and reuse of laundry wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
55
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
55
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ramon et al (2004) compared the filtration efficiency of low load gray water using ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes. In addition, Ciabatti et al (2009) employed an ultrafiltration membrane and achieved an effective removal efficiency of contaminants in laundry effluent. However, the major disadvantage of membrane process is fouling (Koh et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ramon et al (2004) compared the filtration efficiency of low load gray water using ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes. In addition, Ciabatti et al (2009) employed an ultrafiltration membrane and achieved an effective removal efficiency of contaminants in laundry effluent. However, the major disadvantage of membrane process is fouling (Koh et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Laundry water is one type of gray water, which consists of high concentrations of chemicals from soap powders as well as bleaches, suspended solids and possibly oil, paints etc. These have chemical oxygen demands (COD) values of 1200-20,000 mg/l, while laundries that wash items from households and hotels contain effluents with COD values of 400-1200 mg/l (Ciabatti et al, 2009). The toxic effects of these pollutants are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the UF surfactants removals [16][17][18] are lower than the NF ones [19,20]. Besides, for charged organic compounds, electrostatic attraction or repulsion forces between the component and the membrane infl uences the degree of fouling [21,22]. Van der Bruggen et al [20] concluded that in surfactant removal by NF the anionic surfactants presented the least problems of membrane fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Figure 7 clearly shows the reduction of residual COD as the [H 2 O 2 ]/COD ratio increases. In a related study, Ciabatti et al (2009) recommended the limit value of 100 mg L −1 for COD in order to enable a partial wastewater reuse in an industrial laundry. Except for the [H 2 O 2 ]/COD ratio = 0.5, all tested conditions resulted in residual COD lower than 100 mg L −1 , highlighting the potentiality of UV/H 2 O 2 process for the treatment of hospital laundry wastewater.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Uv-h 2 O 2 Processmentioning
confidence: 99%