2020
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2020.2967510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of a Novel Framework for Proactive Maintenance Using Failure Prediction and Bit Lossless Protection With Autonomous Network Diagnosis System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [48], a Naïve Bayes was used for BER degradation prediction based on real-time state-of-polarization (SOP) monitoring with low complexity, minimal storage, and high speed. In [49], a framework of proactive maintenance was designed for fiber diagnosis. Here, a CNN was adopted to estimate the bend state of remote fiber; protection switching was executed as soon as fiber degradation was detected with no service disruption or bit loss.…”
Section: Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [48], a Naïve Bayes was used for BER degradation prediction based on real-time state-of-polarization (SOP) monitoring with low complexity, minimal storage, and high speed. In [49], a framework of proactive maintenance was designed for fiber diagnosis. Here, a CNN was adopted to estimate the bend state of remote fiber; protection switching was executed as soon as fiber degradation was detected with no service disruption or bit loss.…”
Section: Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the failure of communication system can be accurately predicted in time, the maintenance and the repair work can be done well. It would be changed from "after-the-fact maintenance" to "on-demand maintenance", from "scheduled maintenance" to "at any time maintenance", from "repair maintenance" to "preventive maintenance", which can not only improve the battlefield maintainability and availability of communication system and avoid the failure of combat operations caused by the system failure, but can also save maintenance costs and effectively improve the efficiency-cost ratio of communication system maintenance [1][2][3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%