2020
DOI: 10.3390/f11020226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstrating the Effect of Height Variation on Stand-Level Optimization with Diameter-Structured Matrix Model

Abstract: The weakness of the population matrix models is that they do not take into account the variation inside the class. In this study, we introduce an approach to add height variation of the trees to the diameter-structured matrix models. In this approach, a new sub-model that describes the height growth of the trees is included in the diameter-structured model. We used this height-and diameter-structured matrix model to maximize the net present value (NPV) for the remaining part of the ongoing rotation for Scots p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there were differences between the models regarding total costs, this may have a consequence for stand-level optimisation, as even small changes in endogenous variable values could have a profound effect on optimal solutions (Ahtikoski et al 2018, Pyy et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there were differences between the models regarding total costs, this may have a consequence for stand-level optimisation, as even small changes in endogenous variable values could have a profound effect on optimal solutions (Ahtikoski et al 2018, Pyy et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The width of size classes should be selected accordingly to the time step, such that the trees do not move up more than one class (Usher, 1966). Based on Usher's assumption we selected a class interval of 10 cm, which was also consistent with the diameter range observed for the ingrowth trees, although the wider the class interval the higher the variation inside classes, which could increase the prediction bias (Liang and Picard, 2013;Pyy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weakness of matrix models in general, and of our model in particular, is that it does not consider the variation within classes, for instance by adding the height variation of the trees (Pyy et al, 2020). Thus, the model could be improved by including competition indices that take into account vertical structure, for instance through crown variables (Pretzsch et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pihlainen et al (2014) added carbon storage to the model by Tahvonen et al (2013) and optimized rotation forestry management of Scots pine stands including revenues from both timber production and carbon sequestration. Recently, Pyy et al (2020) presented a size-structured transition matrix model based on diameter breast height that also includes height variations within diameter classes. However, the economic model by Pyy et al (2020) omits all forestry beyond the ongoing rotation (cf.…”
Section: Stand-level Economics Of Continuous Cover and Rotation Forestrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Pyy et al (2020) presented a size-structured transition matrix model based on diameter breast height that also includes height variations within diameter classes. However, the economic model by Pyy et al (2020) omits all forestry beyond the ongoing rotation (cf. Faustmann 1849).…”
Section: Stand-level Economics Of Continuous Cover and Rotation Forestrymentioning
confidence: 99%