2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstrating non-inferiority of easy interpretable methods for insolvency prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, domain experts cannot understand the mechanism behind the model, so to improve it, further research is necessary. ()…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, domain experts cannot understand the mechanism behind the model, so to improve it, further research is necessary. ()…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, compared to the black box model, both risk control experts in the financial field and lay people are more inclined to trust a model in which the result is understandable. Additionally, machine learning models are likely to be incorrect . Besides, if the mechanism behind the model is understood, domain experts' substantial domain knowledge can be combined with the model, building a more powerful model …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prediction of insolvency and rating predictions are essential in the world of finances. Inaccurate predictions may result in erroneous decisions and as a result lead to huge financial losses (Obermann & Waack, 2015). For this reason in practice systems forecasting the financial situation of enterprises are applied (Early Warning Systems -EWS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%