Demonstrating Freeform Fabrication of Fluidic Edible Materials

Luo, Danli; Yang, Humphrey; Khurana, Malika; Qian, Kuanren; Yao, Lining

doi:10.1145/3411763.3451538

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Alginate / Carrot, Chocolate, Dough [ 192] Carbopol / Gelatin μP Alginate, Collagen, Gallium−Indium / Alginate, Polyester, Silk, Stainless steel [ 140] Gelatin μP, Alginate, Collagen Cells [ 230] Collagen, Collagen / Matrigel PLA μP, Collagen / PLA μP/ Spheroids, Collagen / PLA μP/ Cells, Spheroids, Cells [ 63] Alginate / Xanthan gum PEDGA, Acrylamide / Alginate, poly(acrylic acid) / PEDGA, Chitosan / PEDGA, Alginate [ 143] Carbopol, Agarose, Gelatin μP, Fumed silica/mineral oil, Oleic acid / Stearic acid Ionic Alginate-based [ 18,19,24,132,134,135,[137][138][139]156,160,191] , GelMA / poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate), [ 146] Alginate [ 136] Gelatin μP-based Alginate-based [ 190,193] Carbopol Alginate-based [ 27,99,216] , Gelatin / Gellan, Gelatin / Alginate, Alginate, PEGDA [52] Laponite-based Alginate-based [ 32,37,62,175,176] Pluronic-based dECM-based [ 210,228] , Cells, [ 166] Alginate/CNC / GelMA, GelMA, [ 211] Alginate, Collagen, Gallium−Indium / Alginate, Polyester, Silk, Stainless steel, [ 140] Alginate, Alginate / Polyethylene glycol ...…”

Section: Agarose μPmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissecting the Interplay Mechanism among Process Parameters toward the Biofabrication of High‐Quality Shapes in Embedded Bioprinting

Wu,

Yang,

Gupta

et al. 2024

Adv Funct Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Embedded bioprinting overcomes the barriers associated with the conventional extrusion‐based bioprinting process as it enables the direct deposition of bioinks in 3D inside a support bath by providing in situ self‐support for deposited bioinks during bioprinting to prevent their collapse and deformation. Embedded bioprinting improves the shape quality of bioprinted constructs made up of soft materials and low‐viscosity bioinks, leading to a promising strategy for better anatomical mimicry of tissues or organs. Herein, the interplay mechanism among the printing process parameters toward improved shape quality is critically reviewed. The impact of material properties of the support bath and bioink, printing conditions, cross–linking mechanisms, and post‐printing treatment methods, on the printing fidelity, stability, and resolution of the structures is meticulously dissected and thoroughly discussed. Further, the potential scope and applications of this technology in the fields of bioprinting and regenerative medicine are presented. Finally, outstanding challenges and opportunities of embedded bioprinting as well as its promise for fabricating functional solid organs in the future are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Agarose μPmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissecting the Interplay Mechanism among Process Parameters toward the Biofabrication of High‐Quality Shapes in Embedded Bioprinting

Wu,

Yang,

Gupta

et al. 2024

Adv Funct Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We did not observe any digital-to-physical sensory representation in our ethnography, although the From digital representation of wine tasting to designing a digital phenomenon section captures this strategy to some extent. A better example would be 3D printing of digital sensory objects, such as the freeform fabrication of fluidic edible materials (Luo et al, 2021). Future research may explore this strategy's potential for digitalizing multisensory collective activities.…”

Section: Digitalizing Multisensory Collective Activities: Going Beyon...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization of multisensory collective activity: The case of virtual wine tasting

Kruse

Drechsler

2022

Journal of Information Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wine tasting is a multisensory collective activity because it involves other senses in addition to sight and hearing. The importance of these multiple senses for wine tasting makes it more challenging to digitalize than other collective activities. We conducted an ethnography and used a semiotic analysis to explore the strategies to digitalize wine tasting sessions. In so doing, we examined how small artisanal winemakers and wine merchants in Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, and Switzerland moved their wine tasting sessions online to compensate for their lost key revenue streams during the global Covid-19 crisis. Based on our analysis, we present a typology of virtual wine tasting and illustrate how the approach to digitalize wine tasting evolved from a reactive approach to a more proactive one. We also identify strategies to digitalize wine tasting and characterize its social space. We discuss some avenues to regard virtual wine tasting as something more than just a digital representation of in-person wine tasting session by highlighting the mediating role of an information system. Finally, we propose some implications for digitalizing other multisensory collective activities.

show abstract

Demonstrating Freeform Fabrication of Fluidic Edible Materials

Cited by 2 publications

References 13 publications

Dissecting the Interplay Mechanism among Process Parameters toward the Biofabrication of High‐Quality Shapes in Embedded Bioprinting

Dissecting the Interplay Mechanism among Process Parameters toward the Biofabrication of High‐Quality Shapes in Embedded Bioprinting

Digitalization of multisensory collective activity: The case of virtual wine tasting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About