2016
DOI: 10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstrating Cover Crop Mixtures on Iowa Farmland: Management, Soil Health, and Water Quality Benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early season weed suppression with cover crops did not depend on whether it was a mixture or a single cover crop species. This was similar to reports by Brust and Gerhards (2012), Halde et al (2014), Smith et al (2014), and Licht et al (2016). An underlying principle for using cover crops to provide weed suppression is to maximize residue biomass and surface cover, and this is not necessarily guaranteed by cover crops in a mixture (Brennan and Smith, 2005;Hayden et al, 2012;Gawęda et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2014;Nielsen et al, 2015), whereas in some cases, a single species provided similar or more biomass compared with a mixture (Hayden et al, 2012;Gawęda et al, 2014;Mehring et al, 2016;Liebert et al, 2017).…”
Section: Impact Of Type Of Cover Crop and Mixture On Weed Suppressionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Early season weed suppression with cover crops did not depend on whether it was a mixture or a single cover crop species. This was similar to reports by Brust and Gerhards (2012), Halde et al (2014), Smith et al (2014), and Licht et al (2016). An underlying principle for using cover crops to provide weed suppression is to maximize residue biomass and surface cover, and this is not necessarily guaranteed by cover crops in a mixture (Brennan and Smith, 2005;Hayden et al, 2012;Gawęda et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2014;Nielsen et al, 2015), whereas in some cases, a single species provided similar or more biomass compared with a mixture (Hayden et al, 2012;Gawęda et al, 2014;Mehring et al, 2016;Liebert et al, 2017).…”
Section: Impact Of Type Of Cover Crop and Mixture On Weed Suppressionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The discrepant coverage of nutrient excesses in water highlights the possibility that public and farmer perceptions of water and environmental problems may not be reflective of current scientific understanding. Beyond the potential role that scientific literacy may being playing, the FBS, a highly circulated and influential communication channel in the farming community is portraying nutrient issues in ways that call into question the assertions of numerous scientific authorities (EPA; 2017; Jones et al, 2017;Licht et al, 2016;Morefield et al, 2016;Osterberg & Kline;. This may be resulting in yet another disconnect between the scientific community and the public, much like Weathers and Kendall's (2015) findings underlying their argument that "there is a serious disconnect between what the public health community knows about the health threats associated with climate change and what the public knows" (p. 606).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Origin of excess nutrients. Despite there being little question among the scientific community regarding the source of nutrient excess in Iowa's water (EPA; 2017; Jones et al, 2017;Licht et al, 2016;Morefield et al, 2016;Osterberg & Kline;, this was a key issue and point of contention addressed within many articles. Numerous articles appearing in the two agricultural sources and those written by individuals with agricultural ties in the DMR presented the issue of nutrient excesses as natural, dependent primarily on weather, as a consequence of "Mother Nature," or "God's will."…”
Section: Inrs Is Not Enough and Needs To Impose Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%