2015
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2015.1030019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographically corrected normative data for the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised in an elderly sample

Abstract: Demographic variables, such as age, education, and gender, routinely affect performance on neuropsychological tests. Whereas normative data is available to correct for these variables on many tests, it is lacking on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised (HVLT-R) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test –Revised (BVMT-R), especially in the elderly. The current study examines the influence of age, education, and gender on HVLT-R and BVMT-R scores in 290 cognitively intact older adults. Age negatively correlated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both level of education and age were significantly related to performance on most models, which is not a surprising finding in light of well-established work in this area Duff, 2016;Kuslansky et al, 2004;Rivera et al, 2015;Strauss et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Both level of education and age were significantly related to performance on most models, which is not a surprising finding in light of well-established work in this area Duff, 2016;Kuslansky et al, 2004;Rivera et al, 2015;Strauss et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Neurocognitive impairment was classified as mild to moderate (T score, 30-39 [ie, 1-2 SDs below the normative mean]), moderate to severe (T score, ≤29 [ie, >2 SDs below the normative mean]), or unimpaired (T score, >39 [ie, <1 SD below the normative mean]). For the CFQ, cutoff values were used to categorize the scores as very low (≤9), low (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), average (21-43), high (44-54), or very high (≥55). 23 For the SHI, a previously established cutoff value of 6 was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study included the following 9 neuropsychological test scores and 3 neuropsychological process scores (Table 1), which were widely used in the uniform data set and a sample of the Alz­heimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cognitively normal participants. We only replaced AVLT with a shorter word list and less repetitious HVLT-R [19, 22], which is a 12-item (4 words from 3 semantic categories) word list learning and memory test that includes 3 learning trials (List A, Trials 1–3), an interference trial with a different list (List B), a short-delay free recall (Trial 4) for List A, a long-delay free recall (Trial 5) for List A performed 25 min later, and delayed recognition of 24 words (i.e., 12 List A words: 6 “same” categories of related non-List A words and 6 “other” categories of unrelated words). The delayed free correct responses and HVLT-R recognition scores were used for memory assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%