2000
DOI: 10.1093/her/15.2.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England

Abstract: This paper describes a nutrition knowledge survey carried out on a cross-section of the adult population of England (n = 1040), looking at knowledge relating to current dietary recommendations, sources of nutrients, healthy food choices and diet–disease links. Serious gaps in knowledge about even the basic recommendations were discovered, and there was much confusion over the relationship between diet and disease. Significant differences in knowledge between socio-demographic groups were found, with men having… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

45
275
18
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
45
275
18
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings, however, differed in that PBFP was strongly influenced by SES in a way that its impact on dietary outcomes was not independent of social class. In addition, knowledge and attitude about diet and health as measured by PBDQ was not linearly associated with SES, unlike findings from other studies (Parmenter et al, 2000;Turrell and Kavanagh, 2006), which made this variable an independent protective factor for diet quality. Our structural equations modeling confirmed that mediation particularly for PBDQ was nonexistent while PBFP acted as a mediator in particular for energy, fat and sodium intake as well as in the consumption of simple sugars (mediation proportion 410%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Our findings, however, differed in that PBFP was strongly influenced by SES in a way that its impact on dietary outcomes was not independent of social class. In addition, knowledge and attitude about diet and health as measured by PBDQ was not linearly associated with SES, unlike findings from other studies (Parmenter et al, 2000;Turrell and Kavanagh, 2006), which made this variable an independent protective factor for diet quality. Our structural equations modeling confirmed that mediation particularly for PBDQ was nonexistent while PBFP acted as a mediator in particular for energy, fat and sodium intake as well as in the consumption of simple sugars (mediation proportion 410%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…In the current study, parents with a lower education level were less likely to feel that it was important to teach their children about healthy eating. The relationship between education level and parents nutrition knowledge in our study was not as strong as would be expected based on previous literature (26,27) . Given that we had a comparatively even spread of SES by SEIFA and education levels, nutrition knowledge scores may have been influenced by considerable publicity within the media about diet-related issues, including national health promotion campaigns to increase fruit and vegetable consumption (Go For 2&5 TM ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…23 Others have reported an association between sociodemographic factors and food behaviors. 24,25 The strong relationship between educational level 26 and CVD control rates 27,28 also has been previously reported. In agreement with these studies, promotion of socioeconomic status and educational level positively changed food behavior, with declining HVO con- sumption among families in northern Iran.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%