2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEMOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS OF INDO‐PACIFIC BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS (TURSIOPS ADUNCUS) AROUND MIKURA ISLAND, JAPAN

Abstract: Long‐term identification surveys were conducted using video records on Indo‐Pacific bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) around Mikura Island, Tokyo, Japan. On 246 surveys, 3,996 min of video were recorded during each summer season from 1994 to 2001. Two hundred and twenty individuals were observed, including juveniles and neonates, that were not cataloged, but could be identified by association with their mothers. Over the eight‐year study period, the total number of identified and cataloged individuals was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
90
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result found is consistent with values reported for other populations of bottlenose dolphins worldwide (e.g. Wells and Scott, 1990;Kogi et al, 2004). Using the same dataset, mean annual birth rate (calculated as the proportion of calves born to the total population size) was estimated at 9% for the Patos Lagoon population (Fruet et al, 2015a), a result similar to that of the bottlenose dolphins from Moray Firth, Scotland (Wilson et al, 1999) and Fiordland, New Zealand (Haase and Schneider, 2001).…”
Section: Birth Rate and Fecunditysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The result found is consistent with values reported for other populations of bottlenose dolphins worldwide (e.g. Wells and Scott, 1990;Kogi et al, 2004). Using the same dataset, mean annual birth rate (calculated as the proportion of calves born to the total population size) was estimated at 9% for the Patos Lagoon population (Fruet et al, 2015a), a result similar to that of the bottlenose dolphins from Moray Firth, Scotland (Wilson et al, 1999) and Fiordland, New Zealand (Haase and Schneider, 2001).…”
Section: Birth Rate and Fecunditysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The lack of evidence for consistent dominance hierarchies could be related to sample size. That is, multi-year, detailed, lengthy observations of inter-individual interactions are available only from a few wild study populations (e.g., Connor & Krützen, 2015;Dudzinski et al, 2009;Elliser & Herzing, 2014;Kogi et al, 2004;Wells et al, 1987). Assuming dolphin social structure includes some level of dominance hierarchy, specific tactile affiliative behavior(s) might function as a tool to mitigate interactions to reinforce the relationship status among individuals in a group.…”
Section: Alternative Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several dolphin groups studied, it would seem that samesex, same-aged pairings represent the primary framework for the fission-fusion society with mixed-sex associations happening, but not as frequently; for example, Atlantic spotted dolphins, Stenella frontalis, in The Bahamas (Dudzinski, 1996;Elliser & Herzing, 2014;Herzing, 1997;Herzing & Brunnick, 1997); Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops aduncus, around Mikura (Kogi, Hishi, Imamura, Iwatani, & Dudzinski, 2004) and in Australia (Connor, 1992;; common bottlenose dolphins, T. truncatus, in the USA (Wells, 1991;Wells, Scott, & Irvine, 1987) and in The Bahamas (Rossbach & Herzing, 1999). Social tactile contact can be affiliative or agonistic (e.g., Connor, Mann, & Watson-Capps, 2006;Dudzinski, 1996Dudzinski, , 1998, and previous research suggests that at least some dolphins have preferred partners with whom they exchange contact (e.g., Connor et al, 1992;Connor, Smolker, & Bedjer, 2006;Dudzinski, 1998;Herzing & Brunnick, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…when a calf died shortly after birth). This problem is well recognised in other studies of calf survival in marine mammals , Kogi et al 2004, Currey et al 2009b). Failure to record a calving event in which the calf had died soon after birth would cause calf survival rates to be biased high.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 94%