2021
DOI: 10.1086/714079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic History, Not Mating System, Explains Signatures of Inbreeding and Inbreeding Depression in a Large Outbred Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Admixture between populations with different allele frequencies causes gametic associations (i.e., LD) between loci as a function of the difference between the parental populations and the admixture rate (Chakraborty & Weiss, 1988) and the effects of admixture can be variable and can either increase or decrease GWH depending on the magnitude of admixture and the genetic background of the population (Vendrami et al, 2020). Importantly, in both red deer and storm petrel where variance in inbreeding was less than seen recently in Rio Grande silvery minnow, general effects HFC were observed implying inbreeding depression in both a small (Huisman et al, 2016) and a large population (Sin et al, 2021). Hence, inclusion of inbreeding metrics in genetic monitoring of both wild and captive populations of Rio Grande silvery minnow can provide valuable information for adaptive management of the species (e.g., altered augmentation strategies).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Admixture between populations with different allele frequencies causes gametic associations (i.e., LD) between loci as a function of the difference between the parental populations and the admixture rate (Chakraborty & Weiss, 1988) and the effects of admixture can be variable and can either increase or decrease GWH depending on the magnitude of admixture and the genetic background of the population (Vendrami et al, 2020). Importantly, in both red deer and storm petrel where variance in inbreeding was less than seen recently in Rio Grande silvery minnow, general effects HFC were observed implying inbreeding depression in both a small (Huisman et al, 2016) and a large population (Sin et al, 2021). Hence, inclusion of inbreeding metrics in genetic monitoring of both wild and captive populations of Rio Grande silvery minnow can provide valuable information for adaptive management of the species (e.g., altered augmentation strategies).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Like Rio Grande silvery minnow, the population of deer has experienced bottlenecks and admixture between different populations (Huisman et al, 2016). Sin et al (2021) noted that in storm petrel, mating system and inbreeding between close relatives could not account for variance in inbreeding, and hence, suggested that observed variance in inbreeding was explained by past population bottlenecks along with more recent declines in N e and low levels of admixture between Atlantic and Pacific populations of petrels. Footprints of bottlenecks persist even after the population has recovered (Bierne et al, 2000) and can still cause inbreeding depression (Sin et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also measured genome-wide heterozygosity at 2514 loci using restriction site-associated DNA sequencing for 312 adults [48]. We examined the relationship between MHC heterozygosity and genome-wide heterozygosity to determine whether genome-wide variation may explain the patterns between MHC and the chemical profiles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variance in inbreeding is therefore essential for HFCs to be detected [6]. In addition, variance in inbreeding is interesting per se because it depends on both demographic history (e.g., [7]) and mating system (selfing, partial selfing or outcrossing) [8]. For mating system, selfers vs. outcrossers can show contrasting levels of inbreeding, with different consequences for genetic diversity, depending on population history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%