1951
DOI: 10.2307/2753728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic Dilemma in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also indicates that the new estimates are significantly higher than other esti-mates. For the Outer Islands the new estimates are significantly lower than other estimates, particularly those presented by De Meel (1951). Figure 2 indicates the negative population growth in Java during the years of hardship, 1944 and 1945.…”
Section: Reconciling the Available Informationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It also indicates that the new estimates are significantly higher than other esti-mates. For the Outer Islands the new estimates are significantly lower than other estimates, particularly those presented by De Meel (1951). Figure 2 indicates the negative population growth in Java during the years of hardship, 1944 and 1945.…”
Section: Reconciling the Available Informationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The production data for 1949 and 1950 are most likely more adequate, because of the extension of colonial control throughout Java after December 1948 which unified the system used to estimate production. Java, 1940Java, -1950Java, 1939Java, 1940Java, 1941Java, 1942Java, 1943Java, 1944Java, 1945Java, 1946Java, 1947Java, 1948Java, 1949Java, 1950 (1947) suggests that population growth was in fact negative in Java during the years 1944. De Meel (1951 and Keyfitz (1953) suggest similar patterns.…”
Section: Appendix 1: Food Productionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The growth rates for the years 1945-1949 are estimated by trial-and-error, trying to meet two conditions: • the growth rates for Java as a whole are to be around - 1.0% in 1945, 0.0% in 1946, 0.75% in 1947, 1.0% in 1948, 1.5% in 1949. (De Meel, 1951; • the population data for 1950 are obtained by interpolating the obtained population estimates for 1949 and the 1961 census data.…”
Section: Appendix 1: Food Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%