The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51811-4_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic Attribute Inference from Social Multimedia Behaviors: A Cross-OSN Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.2 Studies developing methods for gender and age prediction 3.2.1 Gender 44 studies developed ad-hoc methods to predict the Twitter user's gender. Of these, 32 predicted only gender 28,29,31,33,36,37,47,48,50,51,54,55,58,60,61,64,65,68,71,72,75,81,[83][84][85][86]90,92,94,96,100,101 and gender was predicted along with the user's age in 12 34,44,49,59,62,66,80,80,87,89,91,95 .…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3.2 Studies developing methods for gender and age prediction 3.2.1 Gender 44 studies developed ad-hoc methods to predict the Twitter user's gender. Of these, 32 predicted only gender 28,29,31,33,36,37,47,48,50,51,54,55,58,60,61,64,65,68,71,72,75,81,[83][84][85][86]90,92,94,96,100,101 and gender was predicted along with the user's age in 12 34,44,49,59,62,66,80,80,87,89,91,95 .…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These components were used either for the purpose of manually or semi-automatically validating the gender of a user or for the purpose of computing features describing the user to train a classifier (SI Table S5). Despite data limitations from the Twitter API, it was the main source of data collection, with 18 studies 28,30,31,33,48,50,51,55,58,62,68,71,[85][86][87]95,96,100 collecting data either as a random sample from the Twitter Streaming API or based on keywords or geographic location from the Twitter Search API. One study 61 collected data using a scraping tool, three 59,91,92 used a random sample from a collection of 10% of tweets from 2014-2017 or the Twitter archive, and one did not specify its data source 44 .…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…L Xiang et al used dynamic social multimedia behaviour to infer stable demographic attributes and proposed a coupled projection matrix extraction (CPME) method [42] deduces a probability model to calculate the corresponding attributes of user-related topics according to the topics that users' likes and forward [43]. The study [44] proposed several models to infer user attributes based on social network interaction behaviour, including the interest pattern model (IPM), users' interest pattern model (UIPM) and community interest pattern model (CIPM).…”
Section: User Behavior-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compare the performance of three classifiers of Naive Bayes, Singular Value Machine (SVM) as well as Logistic Regression (LR), and find that LR shows the best performance. Xiang et al [5] infer user attributes using the spatio-temporal behavior of the same user across multiple OSNs. They represent each user using a combined feature vector converted from texts and images in Google+ and Twitter.…”
Section: A Behavior-based Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%