The assessment of quality of care in the practice of medicine has become increasingly important. [1][2][3] The practice of critical care medicine has been especially scrutinized, at least in part because of the enormous costs of providing critical care services. 4,5 Aside from external pressures, monitoring and improvement of quality of care are important to clinicians. 6,7 Misuse of quality measures may occur and "[risks] stigmatizing an entire institution," 8 so it is imperative that any assessment of the quality of care delivered in the ICU involves a consideration of the severity of patient illness using a reliable measure. The Joint Commission 9 has proposed severity-adjusted mortality rate as a specifi c measure that should be recorded.Prognostic scoring systems have been developed by the critical care community in an effort to quantify the severity of illness of a given patient or group of patients. 10-12 Adjustment for severity of illness enables monitoring of the performance of an ICU over time and for comparison of ICUs in the same or different hospitals. It is imperative that such severity adjustments be as accurate as possible. 13 Many prognostic models exist, suggesting that the optimum model has not been established. The three most commonly used adult-ICU prognostic scoring systems are APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS), and the Mortality Probability Conclusions: APACHE III and IV had similar discriminatory capability and both were better than SAPS 3, which was better than MPM 0 III. The calibrations of the models studied were poor. Overall, models with more predictor variables performed better than those with fewer. The addition of resuscitation status did not improve APACHE III or IV or SAPS 3 prediction.
CHEST 2012; 142(4):851 -858Abbreviations: APACHE 5 Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; AUC 5 area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; DNR 5 do not resuscitate; MPM 5 Mortality Probability Model; ROC 5 receiver operating characteristic; SAPS 5 Simplifi ed Acute Physiology Score