2014 IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cbi.2014.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratizing Business Process Management: Empowering Process Participants to Contribute to the Enactment of Business Processes

Abstract: Employee empowerment, meaning among other granting employees discretion to change work processes, has been identified as mean to improve the performance of an organization. Although the involvement of business process participants has been identified as one of the key success factors for BPM projects, end users are typically not participating in the modeling process nor are they involved in the implementation of the modelled processes based on supporting IT systems. Therefore the direct influence of employees … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While studies have been done on different people aspects of BPM (Benraad et al, 2022;Danilova, 2018;Harmon, 2007;Hermkens et al, 2022;Kratzer et al, 2019;M€ uller et al, 2016;Skrinjar & Trkman, 2013), most of them deal with management, organizational, and cultural perspectives. Few studies have been conducted to explore employee-related topics, such as the resistance to change among employees during BPM implementation, empowerment aspects of BPM, and employees' perception of BPM (Mertens et al, 2011;Meyer & Schiffner, 2014;Pereira et al, 2019). Prior studies have proven that BPM has both a direct and indirect positive effect on organizational performance (Hernaus, 2012;Klun & Trkman, 2018;Skrinjar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Business Processes and Bpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studies have been done on different people aspects of BPM (Benraad et al, 2022;Danilova, 2018;Harmon, 2007;Hermkens et al, 2022;Kratzer et al, 2019;M€ uller et al, 2016;Skrinjar & Trkman, 2013), most of them deal with management, organizational, and cultural perspectives. Few studies have been conducted to explore employee-related topics, such as the resistance to change among employees during BPM implementation, empowerment aspects of BPM, and employees' perception of BPM (Mertens et al, 2011;Meyer & Schiffner, 2014;Pereira et al, 2019). Prior studies have proven that BPM has both a direct and indirect positive effect on organizational performance (Hernaus, 2012;Klun & Trkman, 2018;Skrinjar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Business Processes and Bpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, Bruno et al (2011) address the challenges and the role of social software in enabling agile BPM through seven key approaches, including fostering the motivation to participate, sharing knowledge and fostering collaboration. Meyer and Schiffner (2014) focus on increasing employees’ involvement and by presenting an agile BPM approach, they enrich process models iteratively and reduces models’ size and complexity. Additionally, another challenge that organisations are dealing with is efficient project and change requirement gathering.…”
Section: Agility In Bpm: a Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%