The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.development.1100324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratization, Inclusion and the Moderation of Islamist Parties

Abstract: Jillian Schwedler examines three questions about the political inclusion of Islamist groups in the Middle East. Using empirical evidence from studies of elections in the region, she discusses whether inclusion or exclusion is a better strategy for deflating radical challenges. She concludes that inclusion is far more likely to produce an overall moderate political sphere, though it is unlikely to eliminate all forms of radicalism. Development (2007) 50, 56–61. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100324

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the disciplines of Middle East politics and terrorism studies, the debate on moderation has largely centred on Islamist entities due to their habitual ex- Ashour (2009Ashour ( , 2011, Bayat (2007), Browers (2009), Clark (2006), Norton (1995, Schwedler (2007Schwedler ( , 2011Schwedler ( , 2013 and Wickham (2004Wickham ( , 2013 have all provided important insights into the workings of and systemic effects upon Islamist parties by way of their inclusion/exclusion from formal politics, i.e., contributing to what has been termed the "inclusion-moderation hypothesis". The inclusion-moderation hypothesis fundamentally seeks to explain the behaviour, ideology and strategies of Islamist movements and parties, the basic assumption being that the integration of such radical/anti-establishment parties into formal (pluralist, but not necessarily democratic) politics will lead to change in the form of moderation of these actors.…”
Section: From Post-rebel Parties To Islamist Inclusion and Moderationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the disciplines of Middle East politics and terrorism studies, the debate on moderation has largely centred on Islamist entities due to their habitual ex- Ashour (2009Ashour ( , 2011, Bayat (2007), Browers (2009), Clark (2006), Norton (1995, Schwedler (2007Schwedler ( , 2011Schwedler ( , 2013 and Wickham (2004Wickham ( , 2013 have all provided important insights into the workings of and systemic effects upon Islamist parties by way of their inclusion/exclusion from formal politics, i.e., contributing to what has been termed the "inclusion-moderation hypothesis". The inclusion-moderation hypothesis fundamentally seeks to explain the behaviour, ideology and strategies of Islamist movements and parties, the basic assumption being that the integration of such radical/anti-establishment parties into formal (pluralist, but not necessarily democratic) politics will lead to change in the form of moderation of these actors.…”
Section: From Post-rebel Parties To Islamist Inclusion and Moderationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies on the Arab world, inclusion most often means formal participation in the political arena, especially in liberalised autocracies (Brumberg 2002). In this sense, political parties, especially Islamist parties, have been a focus of past studies (see for instance Lust-Okar 2005, Schwedler 2007, Wegner 2011. However, as the Arab uprisings were characterised by mass protests outside formal institutions, such a concept doesn't exactly fit the phenomenon under investigation.…”
Section: Conceptual Considerations: a Target-oriented Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 As a leading scholar writes, Islamist moderation has emerged as 'the issue at stake in debates on Islamist political participation'. 3 This literature focuses on whether the inclusion of Islamist organizations in the formal political processes leads to their ideological moderation. Moderation is typically defined narrowly as 'becoming truly committed to democratic practices'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%