1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-18173-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratic Socialism in Jamaica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The move, accompanied by increasingly militant rhetoric, caused alarm among American mine owners and their Washington, D.C. representatives. Manley did not bow to American pressure, however, and instead, in 1973, declared "democratic socialism" in Jamaica (Stephens and Stephens 1986).…”
Section: Democratic Socialism As Decolonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The move, accompanied by increasingly militant rhetoric, caused alarm among American mine owners and their Washington, D.C. representatives. Manley did not bow to American pressure, however, and instead, in 1973, declared "democratic socialism" in Jamaica (Stephens and Stephens 1986).…”
Section: Democratic Socialism As Decolonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although his government never sought a full nationalization of assets, its increasingly radical rhetoric and anti-imperialist stance antagonized local and foreign ruling classes. Many wealthy Jamaicans left the island with their capital, while investments and tourism revenues plummeted as a result of an orchestrated effort to portray Jamaica as unsafe on Western media outlets (Stephens and Stephens 1986).…”
Section: Crime and Counterrevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80 In their account of Jamaica in the 1970s, Stephens and Stephens have argued that workers in patronage jobs believed that the job was a "quid pro quo for previous party work" and that "thus no additional work effort" was needed to justify holding it. 81 A 1971 commission investigating the allocation of Christmas work by the KSAC concluded that "little meaningful work was done" on gully cleaning projects. 82 But there is little evidence that throughout the post-independence period drainage work allocated on a partisan basis was routinely of substandard quality because workers saw it as a reward from their patrons for their party support rather than work.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although attempts were made to allow both parties to recommend workers for SEP projects, most work was allocated to people recommended by ruling-party MPs and councilors. 83 The JLP strongly condemned the allocation of work for SEP projects but did not abolish the SEP when it assumed power in 1980. As Stephens and Stephens have argued, doing so would have been "politically very costly," as JLP supporters expected a return for their party support after the election victory.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation