Democratic politics and hope: An Arendtian perspective

Abstract

Narratives of hope are omnipresent in democratic life, but what can they tell us about the structure and orientation of politics? While common, they are often reduced to an all-compassing understanding that overlooks hope's various forms and implications. Democratic theory, however, lacks the theoretical language to attend to these distinctions. The aim of this essay is thus to define a collective and political account of hope and recover the normative basis of a democratic theory of hope. Drawing on the literature on hope and juxtaposing it with extracts from Harvey Milk's ‘The Hope Speech,’ I first distinguish its collective experience before turning to Hannah Arendt. While Arendt rejects a politics of hope that turns away from the world, exploring how she thinks with and against hope provides a theoretically fruitful approach that elevates the in-betweenness of its worldly expression. From that standpoint, I relate the work and experience of hoping with others to her notions of natality, action and promises. These three conceptual touchstones provide the normative basis of a democratic theory of hope and help situate a collective sense of possibility inherent in democratic politics.

Experimentation and the future(s) of political hope

“… 5. Representative examples are Dienstag (2006), Strong (2012) and Marasco (2015). There is a small but growing literature on hope that runs counter to this tendency; see, for example, Blöser et al (2020), Goldman (2012, 2023), Huber (2021), Lacelle-Webster (2023), Mittleman (2009), Moellendorf (2022), Stahl (2019), Stockdale (2021), Thaler (2018), and Thaler (2019). …”

“… 22. In this regard, political hope entails miracles in Arendt’s secularized sense of collaborative action that disrupts the predictable, ‘natural’ historical trajectories; see Lacelle-Webster (2023) and Goldman (forthcoming). …”