Corruption and Norms 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66254-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratic Norms, Political Money, and Corruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the top politicians (the government, parties and leading politicians) are corrupt, then corruption manifests itself at all levels, and this evil simultaneously spreads among the ordinary population because no one trusts the institutions or the rule of law. Johnston (2000) points to useful thinking in terms of two types of balance – the balance between openness and autonomy of institutions and elites, and the balance between political and economic power and opportunities for cooperation. Ideally, institutions should be open to influence and feedback from various sources, but at the same time independent enough to perform their work effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the top politicians (the government, parties and leading politicians) are corrupt, then corruption manifests itself at all levels, and this evil simultaneously spreads among the ordinary population because no one trusts the institutions or the rule of law. Johnston (2000) points to useful thinking in terms of two types of balance – the balance between openness and autonomy of institutions and elites, and the balance between political and economic power and opportunities for cooperation. Ideally, institutions should be open to influence and feedback from various sources, but at the same time independent enough to perform their work effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corruption in rentier states has been associated with specific characteristics such as poor governance, weak institutions, and clientelism (Johnston, 1999), but has also a great effect on the behavior of the elite. The elite is able, through manipulating government resources, to retain political support through dispersing tangible benefits for the voters, buying votes, and building as well as sustaining an entire system of corrupt practices (Manzetti & Wilson, 2007).…”
Section: The Elite Versus Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Johnson, the burden of corruption is on the shoulders of people with low incomes and therefore pay part of their income to individuals with high incomes. Corruption diverts government spending from projects that benefit low-income people, such as health and education, and goes to spending on defense and armaments, where corruption is widespread [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%