2001
DOI: 10.1080/1360312011080978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratic leadership theory in late modernity: an oxymoron or ironic possibility?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result contradicts that of Starrat (2001) whose study showed that highly satisfied and more involved workers largely depend on the leaders.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…This result contradicts that of Starrat (2001) whose study showed that highly satisfied and more involved workers largely depend on the leaders.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Firstly, hierarchies and oligarchies may rapidly develop that allow elites to control resources regardless of the precise ownership and control mechanisms established (Michels, 1961;Vanek, 1977;Cornforth et al, 1988). Secondly, emphasising collective over individual rights often becomes oppressive to individuals (and out of favour groups) by legitimating "collective" solutions that are expressions of managerial interests (see Willmott, 1993;Starrat, 2001;Parker, 2002;Johnson, 2006).…”
Section: Concepts Of Social Enterprisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since democracy is a complicated conception and democratization within schools is not a straightforward process (Starratt 2003), this paper has only 'touched' the surface. Given the character of this paper, causal or other inferences cannot be drawn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%