Democratic Governance

Bevir, Mark

doi:10.1515/9781400836857

Cited by 347 publications

(123 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…En algunas de las contribuciones a ese debate se centró la atención en la evaluación de los espacios y mecanismos concretos de participación (Anduiza y De Maya, 2005;Fung, 2003;Jorba, Martí y Parés, 2007;Papadopoulus y Warin, 2007), mientras que otros lo abordaron a partir de la llamada gobernanza en red (Bevir, 2010;Mathur y Skelcher, 2007;Sorensen y Torfing, 2005). Así, las nuevas formas de gobernanza participativa impulsadas desde las administraciones públicas, basadas en el análisis de políticas públicas, se acompañaron de nuevos enfoques evaluativos que pusieron el acento en el papel de los actores en general y de la ciudadanía en particular, la articulación más o menos democrática de las redes de gobernanza y el análisis de los mecanismos participativos, tanto en lo relativo a su funcionamiento como a sus impactos en las políticas públicas.…”

Section: B Políticas Públicas E Internetunclassified

Desde el Gobierno Abierto al Estado Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe

2017

ECLAC Books

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: B Políticas Públicas E Internetunclassified

Desde el Gobierno Abierto al Estado Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe

2017

ECLAC Books

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These included models of push-or pulloriented technology-forcing based on a linear understanding of the innovation process, freemarket approaches that advocated abstaining from attempts to govern innovation apart from regulating end markets and thus giving incentives for environmentally oriented innovation, or approaches that saw innovation processes as embedded in broader power structures and therefore framed technology development mainly in terms of political struggle, leaving little room for problem-oriented collective learning on the side of innovators and society or in governance. Yet, at a broader level SNM was resonating positively with tentative articulations of a "third way" between economy and ecology that were transnationally taking shape at that time in the form of discourses of ecological modernisation (Hajer 1995) and sustainable development (Redclift 1993), and with an even wider increase in interest in a discourse of "new governance," which decentred the role of state agency in accounting for processes of collective ordering (Rhodes 1996, Djelic and Sahlin-Andersson 2006, Bevir 2010. The latter helped SNM to gain ground in relation to competing models, both in policy studies and in policy-making.…”

Section: Figure 1: Realising Governance As Co-production Of Epistemicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performative policy studies: realizing “transition management”

Voß

2014

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper analyses the relations between policy studies and public policy. It traces how they are constitutively entangled. Conceptually, this builds on a notion of performativity that has been developed in science studies. The performativity of policy studies is explored in a case study of the innovation journey of 'transition management' as a model for governing sociotechnical change. The paper shows how practices of knowledge production and policy-making take shape in interaction with the model and how a specialised research field co-evolves with political alliances and policy programmes. They interact in the process of realising transition management, both by establishing the model as collective knowledge and by materially enacting it. In this interweaving with public policy policy studies contribute to creating the reality that they describe. The conclusions discuss 'realising' as a mode of governance.

show abstract

“…the private sector, Aboriginal communities, civil society organizations). More broadly, governance considers who gets to contribute to the decision-making and who gets to decide (Bevir 2010). 7 The concept of institution is broad and diffuse.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Climate change adaptation and sustainable forest management: A proposed reflexive research agenda

Klenk

Adams²,

Bull

et al. 2011

The Forestry Chronicle

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is a synthesis of the salient topics discussed in the Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) Workshop, held at the University of British Columbia, February 14-16, 2011, and lays out a research agenda based on the recommendations for future research that emerged in the workshop. The proposed research agenda is framed using the theory of reflexive modernization to enable the forest research community to consider how different modes of knowledge production can support adaptation within SFM. The workshop discussions highlighted the importance of considering extreme events and high uncertainty in planning for adaptation within SFM. Participants discussed the utility of climate change modeling and risk assessment for local decision-making. In addition, there was general agreement that adaptive collaborative management could facilitate adaptation within SFM, despite difficulties in implementation. The recommendations for future research that emerged from the workshop focused on climate change-related assessments, modeling techniques, and governance and institutional enablers/barriers to adaptation. This broad research agenda, however, can be approached using different modes of knowledge production, illustrating different orders of reflexivity. Apart from a call for more traditional academic research to improve SFM under climate change, workshop participants referred to the need for participatory research, in which researchers would be embedded in communities and other contexts of application, engaging in a "client-focused" partnership model to produce knowledge that is robust, compelling, legitimate and, above all, locally relevant. It is hoped that this alternative mode of knowledge production would result in a social license and greater political will to accelerate adaptation within SFM.

show abstract

Democratic Governance

Cited by 347 publications

References 0 publications

Desde el Gobierno Abierto al Estado Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe

Desde el Gobierno Abierto al Estado Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe

Performative policy studies: realizing “transition management”

Climate change adaptation and sustainable forest management: A proposed reflexive research agenda

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About