State and Civil Society in Northern Europe
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1x76dkp.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratic Governance and the Creation of Social Capital in Sweden:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these settings, participants are encouraged to listen to a range of different viewpoints and work through dialogue and negotiation to reach a compromise if not consensus (compare Habermas 1981). Hybrid state-citizen commissions, made up of citizen representatives, civic leaders, and state officials, can open up a space for dialogue between civil society organizations and state actors, a space not available through conventional electoral politics, and can potentially generate trust among the participants (Trägårdh 2007). Both mechanisms provide for a more inclusive mode of decisionmaking where various social groups and political actors can get the sense that their opinions matter to state elites and their interests may be incorporated into legislative proposals.…”
Section: Washington: Deliberative Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these settings, participants are encouraged to listen to a range of different viewpoints and work through dialogue and negotiation to reach a compromise if not consensus (compare Habermas 1981). Hybrid state-citizen commissions, made up of citizen representatives, civic leaders, and state officials, can open up a space for dialogue between civil society organizations and state actors, a space not available through conventional electoral politics, and can potentially generate trust among the participants (Trägårdh 2007). Both mechanisms provide for a more inclusive mode of decisionmaking where various social groups and political actors can get the sense that their opinions matter to state elites and their interests may be incorporated into legislative proposals.…”
Section: Washington: Deliberative Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the referral process -a specific Swedish form of stakeholder response to governmental investigations Trädgårdh (2007) -the SSNC indicated that they accepted clear-cutting as a forestry method. Enander (2007) maintains that this SSNC position was highly important for subsequent forestry debate.…”
Section: Widespread Criticism From Engos and The Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, it was largely voluntary organizations with close contact to the government that were invited to participate. Being invited to the commission process and other corporative settings presupposed a close collaboration with the government where compromises and consensus-seeking processes with organizations were an integral part of the policy process (Elvander, 1974;Trägårdh, 2007). It is possible that the same institutional 'logic' (March & Olsen, 1989) inherited in the commission process is discernible here and influences which voluntary organizations government chooses to invite.…”
Section: Theoretical Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remiss procedure is formally ascribed in the constitution and historically put forward as one of the most unique, deliberative and pluralistic parts of the Swedish policy process in which a wide range of organizations are consulted before a decision is made (Anton, 1969;Trägårdh, 2007). More precisely, this article explores the factors that characterize voluntary organizations invited to the remiss procedure and discusses the result from different theoretical perspectives: pluralism, network governance and the theory of political opportunity structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%