Abstract:The position of Czech public finances has been pronounced unsustainable by economists, while politicians claim more or less the opposite. Correct judgment is complicated by the purposeful use of arguments by the two groups in disagreement, by use of different methodology to collect the data and above all, by the fact that there is no precise benchmark for measuring the sustainability. My work attempts to surpass those complications. It attempts to shed more light on Czech public finances sustainability and to … Show more
“…Therefore, he claimed that there is a positive correlation running from tax revenues to government spending. Buchanan and Wagner (1977) also claim that the causality between government expenditures and tax revenues is from the latter to the former, however, the sign of the link is negative. They argue that financing the government expenditures via direct taxes causes a fiscal illusion, which implies that citizens consider public goods and services more expensive than they actually are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They argue that financing the government expenditures via direct taxes causes a fiscal illusion, which implies that citizens consider public goods and services more expensive than they actually are. This causes a reduction in demand for public goods and services which eventually decreases public expenditures (Buchanan & Wagner, 1977).…”
This study explores the time-frequency dependency between government expenditures and tax revenues by employing the wavelet coherence approach using data from the United States of America (USA) for the period of 1960Q2 to 2019Q3. The four leading concepts regarding the correlation between government expenditures and tax revenues are the tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax, fiscal synchronization and institutional separation hypotheses. Our results indicate that government expenditures lead to tax revenues in both the short and long run for specific time intervals as proposed by the spend-and-tax hypothesis.
“…Therefore, he claimed that there is a positive correlation running from tax revenues to government spending. Buchanan and Wagner (1977) also claim that the causality between government expenditures and tax revenues is from the latter to the former, however, the sign of the link is negative. They argue that financing the government expenditures via direct taxes causes a fiscal illusion, which implies that citizens consider public goods and services more expensive than they actually are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They argue that financing the government expenditures via direct taxes causes a fiscal illusion, which implies that citizens consider public goods and services more expensive than they actually are. This causes a reduction in demand for public goods and services which eventually decreases public expenditures (Buchanan & Wagner, 1977).…”
This study explores the time-frequency dependency between government expenditures and tax revenues by employing the wavelet coherence approach using data from the United States of America (USA) for the period of 1960Q2 to 2019Q3. The four leading concepts regarding the correlation between government expenditures and tax revenues are the tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax, fiscal synchronization and institutional separation hypotheses. Our results indicate that government expenditures lead to tax revenues in both the short and long run for specific time intervals as proposed by the spend-and-tax hypothesis.
“…In democratic political systems, voters tend to punish policymakers for painful reforms (Buchanan & Wagner, 1977). But a backdoor to reduce real public debt without painful reforms is the inflation tax (Lerner, 1955).…”
Rising public debt everywhere has raised the question of how to reduce debt again in the future. High public debt also seems to be an impediment for the exit of central banks from ultra-low interest rates and quantitative easing. Historical precedents and proposals have included austerity, haircuts and the generation of inflation. Each way has advantages and disadvantages, including uncertainty about effects and side-effects. We approach the issue from an historical perspective, based on case studies of prominent approaches to debt reduction. We analyze debt reduction through economic austerity in Italy, hyperinflation in Germany after World War I, inflation in Argentina since the 1980s, currency reform in Germany after WW II, and financial repression in the United States and the United Kingdom after WW II. Finally, we discuss Ronald McKinnon's order of economic and financial liberalization as well as the Chicago Plan combined with the introduction of central bank digital currencies as an option for the future.
“…One of the earliest arguments made in the public choice literature to explain the electorate's apparent debt tolerance is that voters may suffer from 'fiscal illusion', i.e., they lack information about the future costs associated with deficit spending (e.g., Buchanan and Wagner, 1977). Arguably, being able to accurately assess the costs of deficit financing presupposes that voters have sufficient knowledge about the economy.…”
Section: Explanatory Variables and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Party preference: A widespread conjecture is that public debt incurrence is associated with the government's political ideology-i.e., leftist governments are supposed to be more inclined to rely on deficit spending than are their right-wing counterparts (e.g., Buchanan and Wagner, 1977). Accordingly, supporters of leftist parties may be more tolerant of public indebtedness than supporters of conservative parties.…”
Section: H3: (Factual) Knowledge About the Costs Associated With Defi...mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.