Democracy, Dependency, and Destabilization: The Shaking of Allende's Regime

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 198.91.37.As demonstrated by the 1988 American policy toward Panama, destabilization is still a prominent strategy in American foreign policy. Unfortunately, as a theoretical concept destabilization has received only marginal attention. Furthermore, what little work has been done on destabilization has embedded the concept in the general discussion on sanctions.' But the literature on the use of economic power politics in general and on sanctions in particular almost always proceeds from a mechanically economic point of view.2 In such frameworks the crucial factors explaining the results of economic power politics are the relative I As a distinct concept, destabilization is discussed briefly by

Pacific unions: a reappraisal of the theory that ‘democracies do not go to war with each other’

“…The Nixon administration was quick to realize that if the destablization of Chile was executed properly the American public would be ignorant of it, and the deterioration in Chile would be attributed to the Allende regime and its policies rather than to a foreign power. 38 The irony of US intervention in Chile is that it was precisely because Chile was not an autocracy that its decentralized and independent institutions could be penetrated and turned against the president. 39 The Chile episode illustrates a grave flaw in the democratic-peace theory.…”

“…38 The irony of US intervention in Chile is that it was precisely because Chile was not an autocracy that its decentralized and independent institutions could be penetrated and turned against the president. 39 The Chile episode illustrates a grave flaw in the democratic-peace theory. As a result of US intervention, an elected leader was deposed in a military coup which led to his and some of his followers' deaths.…”

The Venezuela Dilemma: Why do Sanctions Continue to Fail to Dislodge the Venezuelan Regime?

“…International Affairs, 91(3), pp.477. 24 Merom, G., 1990. Democracy, dependency, and destabilization: The shaking of Allende's regime.…”