Most of this volume's chapters review studies rooted in political science, communication, and closely related disciplines. Indeed, many reference a small clique of foundational authors in agreement and/or disagreement, including Castells, Benkler, Hindman, Jenkins, Morozov, and Shirky. In the current chapter I diverge from this norm to examine a body of literature only rarely acknowledged by mainstream digital politics scholarship. This literature contains politicallyrelevant research by computer scientists and information scientists and is published under a variety of disciplinary labels, but will be referred to here as social computing research. As its name implies, social computing research's purview includes any aspect of human behavior involving both digital technology and more than one person (Parameswaran & Whinston, 2007; Wang, Carley, Zeng, & Mao, 2007). Politics accounts for a small but thriving subset of this literature, which also encompasses health, business, economics, entertainment, artificial intelligence, and disaster response, among other topics. Social computing research on politics holds relevance for scholars of digital politics and political communication for two related reasons, the first methodological and the second theoretical. Social computing researchers have for many years led the vanguard in computational and "Big Data" methods (sometimes in combination with other methods), in which the disciplines of political science and communication have both expressed great interest of late. 1