2014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1375173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demineralized Bone Matrix for Alveolar Cleft Management

Abstract: The aim of this article is to describe the results of the use of demineralized bone matrix putty in alveolar cleft of patients with cleft lip and palate. We performed a prospective, descriptive case series study, in which we evaluated the results of the management of alveolar clefts with demineralized bone matrix. Surgery was performed in 10 patients aged between 7 and 26 years (mean 13 years), involving a total of 13 clefts in the 10 patients. A preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although alveolar cleft reconstruction has relied heavily on autologous ICBG, advances in allographic bone grafting agents have been shown more recently to be feasible, acting as potential substitutes. 16,17 While these agents alone have been demonstrated to be inferior to autogenic bone grafting when used individually, 18,19 acceptable outcomes have been reported when used in combination with each other or in conjunction with autologous bone grafting. 8,9 Our results suggest the feasibility of grafting using DBX, rhBMP-2, and FDBC in regard to overall graft take in the setting of early alveolar cleft repair, concomitant hard palate and alveolar cleft repair, secondary alveolar cleft repair, and regrafting from a failed ICBG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although alveolar cleft reconstruction has relied heavily on autologous ICBG, advances in allographic bone grafting agents have been shown more recently to be feasible, acting as potential substitutes. 16,17 While these agents alone have been demonstrated to be inferior to autogenic bone grafting when used individually, 18,19 acceptable outcomes have been reported when used in combination with each other or in conjunction with autologous bone grafting. 8,9 Our results suggest the feasibility of grafting using DBX, rhBMP-2, and FDBC in regard to overall graft take in the setting of early alveolar cleft repair, concomitant hard palate and alveolar cleft repair, secondary alveolar cleft repair, and regrafting from a failed ICBG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 More recent meta-analysis of BMP-2 use in alveolar cleft repair found bone creation to be effective or higher with BMP-2 compared to traditional autologous grafting, however found a high risk of bias in the articles reviewed. 1820 True clinical trials are required to verify these results which are lacking currently. In addition, complications associated with BMP-2 use have been reported including ectopic bone formation, osteolytic defects, carcinogenesis, wound complications, severe soft tissue swelling, dysphagia, and respiratory compromise, 12,14,17 although these have not been reported in association with cleft ABG procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%