Aim: Neuropathological examination of both individuals in a monozygotic (MZ) twin pair with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is rare, especially in the molecular genetic era. We had the opportunity to assess the concordance and discordance of clinical presentation and neuropathology in three MZ twin pairs with AD. Methods: The MZ twins were identified and characterised by the University of Washington Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. We reviewed the available clinical and neuropathological records for all six cases looking specifically for concordance and discordance of clinical phenotype, neuritic amyloid plaques (NP), neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and Lewy related pathology (LRP). Results: Discordance in age of onset for developing AD in the MZ twins varied from 4 to 18 years. Clinical presentations also differed between twins. One twin presented with a dementia with Lewy Body clinical syndrome while the other presented with typical clinical AD. Neuropathology within the MZ twin pairs was concordant for NP and NFT, regardless of duration of disease, and was discordant for LRP. This difference was most marked in the late onset AD twin pair. One pair was found to have a mutation in presenilin-1 (PS1) (A79V) with remarkably late onset in a family member. Conclusions: MZ twins with AD can vary considerably in age of onset, presentation and disease duration. The concordance of NP and NFT pathological change and the discordance of LRP support the concept that, in AD, the former are primarily under genetic control whereas the latter (LRP) is more influenced by disease duration and environmental factors. The A79V mutation in PS1 can be associated with very late onset of dementia. A lzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder causing dementia in the elderly. AD has typically been divided into early onset (EOAD, onset ,60 years) and late onset (LOAD, onset >60 years). LOAD occurs in the majority (.95%) of patients with AD 1 while EOAD accounts for a small proportion of patients (,5%). Demarcation of familial LOAD/EOAD is not absolute as approximately 25% of families with familial LOAD will have members with EOAD, accounting for about 6% of all affected cases.
2The cause of AD is unknown in the majority of cases. The most powerful risk factors for developing LOAD are age, a positive family history and APOE genotype. Specific mendelian genetic factors have also been identified in patients who develop familial EOAD, namely mutations in presenilin 1 (PS1), 4 presenilin 2 (PS2) 5 and amyloid precursor protein.6 PS1 mutations are the most frequent pathogenic mutation in EOAD. 7 Genetic variation influences a number of aspects of clinical phenotype in patients affected by AD, 1 with modelling suggesting that environmental factors are also important in determining development of dementia.8 Monozygotic (MZ) twins provide a unique insight into the relationship between genetic programming and environmental factors impacting on that programming. Twin studies suggest a polygenic multifactorial mode of inheritanc...