2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13184780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand-Response Application in Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Compressed Air Storage System: A Modelling Approach

Abstract: Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are known to be one of the most energy-intensive industrial sectors. In this work, demand response was applied to the biological phase of wastewater treatment to reduce plant electricity cost, considering that the daily peak in flowrate typically coincides with the maximum electricity price. Compressed air storage system, composed of a compressor and an air storage tank, was proposed to allow energy cost reduction. A multi-objective modelling approach was applied by analyzin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the digester, the thermal energy request was calculated considering 2 distinct contributions: the energy needed for heating the incoming material to the desired mesophilic temperature (35 °C), and the energy requested to balance the losses throughout reactor walls. These two terms were calculated as proposed by (Cottes et al, 2020), considering the real geometric dimensions of the reactor, while the specific heat coefficients for seagrass and sludge were taken respectively from (Caldana, 2012) and (Cottes et al, 2020). The mean environmental temperature was obtained from Regional databases (Osmer FVG, 2020).…”
Section: Scenario 1: Anaerobic Digestion (S1_ad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the digester, the thermal energy request was calculated considering 2 distinct contributions: the energy needed for heating the incoming material to the desired mesophilic temperature (35 °C), and the energy requested to balance the losses throughout reactor walls. These two terms were calculated as proposed by (Cottes et al, 2020), considering the real geometric dimensions of the reactor, while the specific heat coefficients for seagrass and sludge were taken respectively from (Caldana, 2012) and (Cottes et al, 2020). The mean environmental temperature was obtained from Regional databases (Osmer FVG, 2020).…”
Section: Scenario 1: Anaerobic Digestion (S1_ad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating costs would include electricity, water and labour costs needed in the grinding and washing phases, and the augmented operating costs for both the WWTP and composting facility (due to seagrass wrack inclusion). The water tariff considered was 1,41 €/m 3 (Irisacqua, 2019), while for electricity the average price paid by the WWTP (0,15 €/kWh) was used and the same cost was assumed, in addition, for the composting plant (Cottes et al, 2020). As the grinding phase was supposed to be mechanical, the additional labour cost was associated only with the washing process.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, 50-60% of operating costs are taken by sludge treatment whereas electric energy takes a 25-40% share of total operating costs [4]. Therefore, efficient energy and nutrient recovery from a WWTP can lead to a better efficiency and reduced costs [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%