Abstract:Demand patterns have been considered important driving forces of intra-industry trade (IIT) ever since the emergence of IIT literature. The distribution of income within countries and per capita income differences between countries are regarded as major explanatory factors behind vertical IIT. This paper focuses on North-South trade, and we are particularly interested in the role of income distribution and per capita income as demand-side determinants of vertical IIT. We test hypotheses on differences in incom… Show more
“…Crespo and Fontoura (2004) also use GDP per capita as a proxy of physical capital and find a positive relationship with VIIT. On the other hand, Gullstrand (2002b), who also uses GDP per capita as a proxy of physical capital, expects a negative relationship with VIIT. However, his empirical results do not support any explanatory power of differences in factor endowments.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since Gullstrand (2002b) and Crespo and Fontoura (2004) find an interaction between difference in income distribution within countries (measured as difference in GINI coefficients) and difference in GDP per capita, we may suspect the effect of AGDPC to depend on INCO. The sign of the interaction will be determined empirically.…”
A common feature in the empirical literature of intra-industry trade is the analysis of trade between a given reference country and a set of partners. This article differs from previous studies by examining the bilateral trade among all trading partners within a set of partners. Using a panel data approach, we find that differences in factor endowments seem not to be important as a driving force behind vertical intra-industry trade for European countries over the chosen period. More important driving forces are production size, geographical proximity, average income per capita and income distribution overlap.
“…Crespo and Fontoura (2004) also use GDP per capita as a proxy of physical capital and find a positive relationship with VIIT. On the other hand, Gullstrand (2002b), who also uses GDP per capita as a proxy of physical capital, expects a negative relationship with VIIT. However, his empirical results do not support any explanatory power of differences in factor endowments.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since Gullstrand (2002b) and Crespo and Fontoura (2004) find an interaction between difference in income distribution within countries (measured as difference in GINI coefficients) and difference in GDP per capita, we may suspect the effect of AGDPC to depend on INCO. The sign of the interaction will be determined empirically.…”
A common feature in the empirical literature of intra-industry trade is the analysis of trade between a given reference country and a set of partners. This article differs from previous studies by examining the bilateral trade among all trading partners within a set of partners. Using a panel data approach, we find that differences in factor endowments seem not to be important as a driving force behind vertical intra-industry trade for European countries over the chosen period. More important driving forces are production size, geographical proximity, average income per capita and income distribution overlap.
“…In many econometric analyses it is pointed out that trade among industrialised countries is characterised by intra-industry trade, i.e., two-way trade, see, e.g., Greenaway et al (1995), Aturupane et al (1999), Durkin and Krygier (2000), Gullstrand (2002), Mora (2002) and Crespo and Fontoura (2004). The intra-industry trade takes place in both final goods and intermediate goods.…”
This article analyses the economic advantages of intra-industry trade in both a final good and the connected intermediate good. In comparison with a situation of autarky, this type of trade brings about an increase in the total number of intermediate good varieties and thereby a reduction in the number of adaptations of intermediate goods to the production process.In this way, the producers of final goods will benefit from varieties of intermediate goods that are closer to the ideal for a specific production process. This determines an increase in the final good productivity and thereby a decrease in the final good price. Thereby both national and global welfare will increase.
“…A study by Gullstrand (2001) focuses on analysing demand patterns and vertical IIT between the North (EU countries) and the South (lower income countries). Employing HS 6-digit level data for 1992, the study reveals that income distribution, per capita income (and their interaction) and average market size are important for vertical IIT.…”
Section: Empirical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies examine intra-industry trade (IIT) at a highly aggregate level, covering a wide range of industries and many countries or country groups (Greenaway, Milner & Elliot et al, 1995;Hellvin, 1996;Gullstrand, More specifically, the application of IIT theory to South Africa is as yet limited (Simson, 1987;Parr, 1994;Isemonger, 2000;Al-Mawali, 2005). The local automotive industry particularly has never been studied from this angle, and so this paper is a first attempt in this direction.…”
This paper provides a study of the theory and empirical evidence of intra-industry trade (IIT) and relates it specifically to South Africa's automobile industry. The automobile industry in South Africa is a key sector within the national economy and has experienced increased trade and foreign investment in recent years, and thus represents an important case study of IIT. In view of this, the paper proposes a methodology that may be used in future to assess the pattern and determinants of IIT between South Africa and its main trading partners in the automobile industry.
JEL F14
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.