2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/974/1/012040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand forecasting of electricity in Indonesia with limited historical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the final parameter estimation results in Table 4, the ARIMA coefficient parameters are obtained as follows: AR ( Based on the prediction model parameters, the DSARIMA model ( [1,2,5,6,7,11,16,18,35,46], 1, [1,3,13,21,27,46]) , (1,1,1) 23 (0,0,1) 445 with the following model equation:…”
Section: Results Of Short Term Load Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the final parameter estimation results in Table 4, the ARIMA coefficient parameters are obtained as follows: AR ( Based on the prediction model parameters, the DSARIMA model ( [1,2,5,6,7,11,16,18,35,46], 1, [1,3,13,21,27,46]) , (1,1,1) 23 (0,0,1) 445 with the following model equation:…”
Section: Results Of Short Term Load Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Table 1, the data has met the white noise criteria with a p-value greater than the error tolerance value 𝛼 = 5%, with an alpha significance level of less than 0.0001. In addition, the model at the time of initial estimation has an improvement pattern with 3 MA parameters, namely MA(1,1), MA(2,1) and MA (3,1), so these three parameters must be included in the model estimation. While the residual assumption test which includes the assumption of white noise must meet the independent criteria and have a normal distribution (0, 𝜎 $ ).…”
Section: B Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that load forecasting methodology base on land use simulation has a smaller error (0.032%) than trending methods (0.126%) or Gompertz analysis (4.571%). Generally, the error tolerance level statistically has prediction under 10% (Kartikasari & Prayogi, 2018). Thus, it can be inferred that the prediction model obtained is sufficient.…”
Section: Methodology Comparison Testingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Generally, the moving average method use to statistical prediction in business and engineering purposes. Some applications of moving average for forecasting are predicting stock price [11], counting electricity demands [12], and foreseeing total delivery goods [13].…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%