2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3179027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand for Money, Structural Break and Money's Role in Monetary Policy in Ghana: An Empirical Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The short-run relationship between financial innovation and the measures of money demand are significantly positive as a 1% increase in the value of financial innovation transactions leads to a 26.5%, 71.90% and 61.60% increase in M1, M2 and M3, respectively. This is consistent with the findings of Hafer and Kutan (2003) in the Philippines, Adil et al (2020) in India, Hye (2009) in Pakistan, Cho and Miles (2007) in Korea, and Akosah et al, (2017), Mannah-Blankson and Belyne ( 2004) and Insah et al (2013) in Ghana. The results indicate that the impact of financial innovation is higher on broad money and in the long run than the short run and could imply that financial innovation increases the velocity money demand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The short-run relationship between financial innovation and the measures of money demand are significantly positive as a 1% increase in the value of financial innovation transactions leads to a 26.5%, 71.90% and 61.60% increase in M1, M2 and M3, respectively. This is consistent with the findings of Hafer and Kutan (2003) in the Philippines, Adil et al (2020) in India, Hye (2009) in Pakistan, Cho and Miles (2007) in Korea, and Akosah et al, (2017), Mannah-Blankson and Belyne ( 2004) and Insah et al (2013) in Ghana. The results indicate that the impact of financial innovation is higher on broad money and in the long run than the short run and could imply that financial innovation increases the velocity money demand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Financial innovation is considered potent in influencing the stability of money demand through the digitalization of money, emergence of virtual currency, ability of electronic fund transfers to substitute cash, and the penetration of digital payment channels. On the empirical front, some studies have identified financial innovation as a major determinant of money demand (Akosah et al, 2017;Cho & Miles, 2007;Insah et al, 2013;Mannah-Blankson & Belyne, 2004). Authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation