2015
DOI: 10.3386/w20955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand Estimation with Machine Learning and Model Combination

Abstract: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning methods have better predictive properties than traditional econometric approaches -this fact has been repeatedly proven in a number of papers. For example, [2] compare neural networks and multinomial logit models in brands' shares prediction and find that neural networks predicts better; [33] shows that regression trees works comparatively better than logistic regression for a larger dataset and also demonstrates some advantages of such methods as bagging, bootstrapping and boosting over traditional econometric approaches; and, finally, [5] compares the predictive power of a number of traditional econometric models and methods of machine learning in a within product category prediction problem, and comes to an unambiguous conclusion of the better performance of the latter.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Machine learning methods have better predictive properties than traditional econometric approaches -this fact has been repeatedly proven in a number of papers. For example, [2] compare neural networks and multinomial logit models in brands' shares prediction and find that neural networks predicts better; [33] shows that regression trees works comparatively better than logistic regression for a larger dataset and also demonstrates some advantages of such methods as bagging, bootstrapping and boosting over traditional econometric approaches; and, finally, [5] compares the predictive power of a number of traditional econometric models and methods of machine learning in a within product category prediction problem, and comes to an unambiguous conclusion of the better performance of the latter.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And if the task of RMSE minimizing has been solving in computer science for quite a long time, the application of the developed models to economic problems with the subsequent possibility of an adequate results interpretation has become widespread recently. To date, there are some studies that partially fill the gap between traditional econometric approach and ML methods in the context of demand prediction ( [15], [33], [6], [5], [34], [30]). In the one of the most recent development [5] authors consider several machine learning techniques and compare them with traditional econometric models, empirically proving better predictive power of the formers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations