2015
DOI: 10.4337/roke.2015.03.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand-driven Goodwin cycles with Kaldorian and Kaleckian features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why single out autonomous‐demand models for their ability to produce level effects that fit the ‘paradox of thrift’ and the ‘paradox of cost’? The paradox of thrift—the contractionary effect of a rise in the saving rate—can be found in models that include feedback effects from the labor market (e.g., von Arnim & Barrales, ; Skott, ). In these models, an increase in the saving rate reduces the employment rate and generates a level effect of the same kind as the one that can be found in the models with autonomous demand.…”
Section: Labor Markets and The Supply Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why single out autonomous‐demand models for their ability to produce level effects that fit the ‘paradox of thrift’ and the ‘paradox of cost’? The paradox of thrift—the contractionary effect of a rise in the saving rate—can be found in models that include feedback effects from the labor market (e.g., von Arnim & Barrales, ; Skott, ). In these models, an increase in the saving rate reduces the employment rate and generates a level effect of the same kind as the one that can be found in the models with autonomous demand.…”
Section: Labor Markets and The Supply Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 There is excess capacity of both labor and capital, and output adjusts instantaneously to the level of demand (within the limits of labor and capital capacity). Using a Leontief production function, the capacity constraints are given by…”
Section: Behavioral Analysis and Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…von Arnim and Barrales (2015) [AB] take a similar approach. The possibility of Harrodian instability is emphasized; their models include an 'output expansion function'that is almost identical to the one in Skott (1989aSkott ( , 1989b; the employment rate is seen as a key element in the determination of output growth and accumulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Responding to the criticism raised by von Arnim and Barrales () regarding the sensitivity of prices and profit share in Kaldor–Goodwin model, Skott () showed that allowing output flexibility with fixed prices produces a dynamic system retaining the same mathematical structure as Kaldor–Goodwin model. In this respect, he proposed the flex–output model in a defensive manner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%