2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand controlled ventilation indoor climate and energy performance in a high performance building with air flow rate controlled chilled beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Occupancy schedule is a crucial factor that can change the HVAC load in buildings. Based on the occupancy level Ahmed et al [11] studied the indoor climate condition and the energy performance of Finnish low energy buildings. The average occupancy rate was 0.55 during office hours, which offered 7-8% of primary energy savings for Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) system compared to Constant Air Volume (CAV) system [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupancy schedule is a crucial factor that can change the HVAC load in buildings. Based on the occupancy level Ahmed et al [11] studied the indoor climate condition and the energy performance of Finnish low energy buildings. The average occupancy rate was 0.55 during office hours, which offered 7-8% of primary energy savings for Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) system compared to Constant Air Volume (CAV) system [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the primary air flow rate is too low, part of the primary air will flow out from the return air inlet directly because of the gravity and little return air will be inducted which will degrade the performance of the RIDU. Compared to the chilled beam [23][24][25][26][27][28], because the mixed air will exchange heat with the radiant panel, the induction ratio cannot be too high to prevent a reduction in the temperature difference between the mixed air and the pore radiant panel. However, a sufficient mixed air flow rate needs to be ensured to maintain a sufficient heat exchange efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmed et al [50] investigated the performance of a demand-controlled VAV chilled beam system in a LEED Platinum office building in Finland. The results indicated that the VAV system saved 7-8% of primary energy compared to a CAV system with equivalent indoor air quality and thermal comfort.…”
Section: Hvac Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%